User talk:A. Köppl

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A. Köppl!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, A. Köppl!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Bild Wernberg Köblitz 2010 05.JPG was uncategorized on 3 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bild Wernberg Köblitz 2010 03.JPG was uncategorized on 3 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bad Neustadt Herschfeld 2011 09.JPG was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Bad Neustadt Herschfeld 2011 07.JPG was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Luhe Fluss Kaimling.jpg was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Kleine Tipps

Hallo Alois, erstmal danke für die vielen tollen Luftaufnahmen; ich habe sie neulich schon bestaunt :-) Zwei Tipps habe ich für Deine Bildbeschreibungen: Wenn Du statt „eigene Arbeit“ die Vorlage {{own}} und statt „März 2011“ das Datum im ISO-Format 2011-03 (oder mit Tag 2011-03-17) einträgst, dann werden die beiden Felder jeweils in der Oberflächensprache angezeigt, die ein Nutzer individuell eingestellt hat. Das ist ziemlich praktisch und hilft u.a. dabei, dass bei Weiterverwendungen korrekte Angaben gemacht werden. Schau Dir mal File:Bild Wollbach 2011 07.JPG an: Formatänderung hierdurch, danach Anzeige in z.B. Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Russisch oder Japanisch. Viele Grüße --:bdk: 20:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Hallo :bdk:!

Danke für deinen Tipp. Ich werde das mal ausprobieren.

Schöne Grüße --A. Köppl (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the pictures!

A. Köppl (talk) 17:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Baron Grusa.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Baron Grusa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Baron Grusa.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Burg_Vildštejn_(Skalná)

Burg Vildštejn (Skalná) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ペーター (talk) 11:14, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry (talk) 20:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hofenstetten Hotel Birkenhof 14 08 2013.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hofenstetten Hotel Birkenhof 14 08 2013.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 21:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Reisach Trausnitz 04.05.2014.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Reisach Trausnitz 04.05.2014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

2014 Gleiritsch Faschingszug 20.JPG

File:2014 Gleiritsch Faschingszug 20.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--İnternion (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:DJK Gleiritsch Lauf Cross Landrat Ebeling Spachtholz Zwack 29 03 2014.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DJK Gleiritsch Lauf Cross Landrat Ebeling Spachtholz Zwack 29 03 2014.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Charlottenhof Schwandorf 09 08 2012.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Charlottenhof Schwandorf 09 08 2012.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:DJK Gleiritsch Cross Lauf Landrat Ebeling Spachtholz Zwack 29 03 2014.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:DJK Gleiritsch Cross Lauf Landrat Ebeling Spachtholz Zwack 29 03 2014.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Katzenstein (Oberpfälzer Wald)

Bitte beachte COM:OVERCAT. Die Category:Gleiritsch ist redundant zur Category:Geography of Gleiritsch. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 20:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Deine Benutzerseite

Hallo A. Köppl,

lieben Dank für Deine vielen, vielen auf Commons hochgeladenen Fotos. Seit einigen Jahren kategorisiere ich u. a. Dateien, und mache doch dabei immer wieder Fehler. Es ist halt kompliziert. Deine Benutzerseite ist in der Category:Gleiritsch gelistet, was den Regeln widerspricht. Ebenso gilt die Regel, dass ein Bild, welches in einer Unterkategorie einsortiert ist, wird nicht noch zusätzlich in der Oberkategorie einsortiert. Weitere Hinweise für das Kategorisieren hast Du bereits erhalten. Liebe Grüße und weiterhin frohes Schaffen wünscht Dir Hystrix (talk) 20:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

An essay for you!

File:No Thought is Alone.jpg

Danke für den Hinweis auf Deiner Benutzerseite, ebenso auf de-WP! (Vermutlich gibt es bald so viele Drohnenbilder auf Commons, wie derzeit street-view-Bilder).

Das Essay ist zwar von der de-WP, trifft inhaltlich aber ebenso auf Commons zu.

Liebe Grüße, Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Essay verschwunden

Leider ist das Essay nicht mehr auffindbar. Besteht hiermit ein Zusammenhang? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Tonialsa/Wikipedia_braucht_Dich_nicht

Liebe Grüße --79.225.116.223 15:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Luftaufnahmen Maxhütte-Haidhof

Sehr geehrter Herr Köppl, habe gerade Ihre Luftaufnahmen auf "Wikiwand" entdeckt. Haben Sie mehrere davon. Kann man sie käuflich erwerben? Wäre für eine kurze Antwort dankbar.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Holger Kistenpfennig

Copyright status: File:Kulmhof Nessating 2018.jpg

Copyright status: File:Kulmhof Nessating 2018.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kulmhof Nessating 2018.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Lizenz ist eingefügt. Hatte ich leider in der Eile vergessen. Danke für den Hinweis.

Schöne Grüße! A. Köppl (talk) 11:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2018 Bornmühle 01.JPG

Copyright status: File:2018 Bornmühle 01.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Bornmühle 01.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Lizenz ist eingefügt! A. Köppl (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2021 Wastlmühle 01.JPG

Copyright status: File:2021 Wastlmühle 01.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2021 Wastlmühle 01.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Lizenz ist eingefügt! A. Köppl (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2021 Isgier 01.jpg

Copyright status: File:2021 Isgier 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2021 Isgier 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Lizenz ist eingefügt! A. Köppl (talk) 18:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2018 Wölsenberg Nabburg 02.jpg

Copyright status: File:2018 Wölsenberg Nabburg 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Wölsenberg Nabburg 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Lizenz ist eingesetzt!

Schöne Grüße aus Gleiritsch A. Köppl (talk) 11:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Willhof Stabhof 2017 01.jpg

Copyright status: File:Willhof Stabhof 2017 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Willhof Stabhof 2017 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Sache erledigt. A. Köppl (talk) 18:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2023 Oberaich 03.JPG

Copyright status: File:2023 Oberaich 03.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2023 Oberaich 03.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Lizenz ergänzt. A. Köppl (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Weihern 2018 12.JPG

Copyright status: File:Weihern 2018 12.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Weihern 2018 12.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Lizenz eingefügt. A. Köppl (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2023 Manteler Forst 01.jpg

Copyright status: File:2023 Manteler Forst 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2023 Manteler Forst 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Bild auf WP-Seite "Mariaorter Wöhrd"

hallo Alois, bin gerade auf deinen fantastischen Luftbilder gestoßen (kennst du diesen Alois? http://www.oberpfalz-luftbild.de/). Das Bild von Mariaort würde auch sehr gut zum Artikel über die Donauinsel passen, am besten Ausschnitt rechts oben. Willst du das selbst machen oder soll ich? Fazhbr (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Grüß dich Fazhbr,

den "anderen Alois" kenne ich nicht. Du kannst das Bild von Mariaort gerne nehmen und auf einer anderen Seite verwenden. Unter "Commons" auf der Seite Regensburg finden sich noch mehr Bilder. Hier ist der Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aerial_photographs_of_Regensburg

Schöne Grüße aus Gleiritsch

Alois Köppl A. Köppl (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

habe ein noch passenderes Bild von dir für die Insel gefunden und eingefügt. Möge die Landschaft noch lange so schön sein. Fazhbr (talk) 20:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Grüß dich,

welche Donauinsel meinst du überhaupt?

Gruß

Alois A. Köppl (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariaorter_W%C3%B6hrd (Name war gar nicht so klar) 88.130.220.178 16:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Grüß dich,

unter Commons habe ich nochmal ein Bild von der Donauinsel eingestellt. Falls das Bild besser passt, bitte einfach einstellen.

Hier der Link zum Bild:

2023 Mariaort Donauinsel 01.jpg

Schöne Grüße aus Gleiritsch

Alois Köppl A. Köppl (talk) 08:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)