User talk:A,Ocram

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A,Ocram!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Permanentgrün

Hello! I am writing on pigments on Swedish wp. I found your fine photo of Permanent Green on Commons and would like to use it. But I have a question: There are two different pigments that can be referred to as Permanent green. Please see PG 17 and Pg 18 here: http://www.artiscreation.com/green.html#ci_pigment_green Which one is shown on your photo (File:Permanentgrün Pigment.JPG)? Best regards! --Chandra Varena (talk) 06:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hej! I am very pleased that you are using my picture! I am searching for this pigment and I will make a new photo for you and wp! I just need some time. Best wishes, A,Ocram (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks - I will be glad to use it once you have made it. All the best! --Chandra Varena (talk) 16:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I am not able to find it, I suppose we ran out of it. I am sorry, but I will adjust the awhite balance. A,Ocram (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Fine, thank you! Are you the photographer of othe pigment photos too? We use many of them in Swedish wikipedia and find them very illustrative. --Chandra Varena (talk) 21:30, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Ah yes. I've done blue, red, yellow for example. A,Ocram (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varecia rubra im Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Uoaei1 05:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pusteblume mit wenigen Samen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. very good composition! Gruß nach Graz! --Hubertl 08:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lachsölkapsel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mohnnudel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krypta in der Sagrat Cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schweizer PC-7 Team.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like it! -- Spurzem 10:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocodylus siamensis (Siam-Krokodil).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo imo.--ArildV 07:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mantelmöwe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Parlamentspalast in Bukarest am Tag.jpg

File:Parlamentspalast in Bukarest am Tag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Propellor einer Stinson Reliant V-77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opferkerzen in Sand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teil des Himmelstempels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! George Washington, Public garden, Boston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Geo location and more EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 19:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old State House, Boston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Capricorn4049 21:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremslicht eines BMW i8 im Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I added a specific cat, which was IMO necessary for QI --Poco a poco 04:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The WTC Transportation Hub.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If the strong vertical perspective is accepted as an element of composition, then at least the strong CAs should be corrected. --PtrQs 21:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)  Done ok so i tried to correct the CAs, hope that this worked properly!--A,Ocram 09:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC) It did - Good Quality --PtrQs 08:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremslicht eines BMW i8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuppelbau im MIT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it should be slightly brighter and the tilt towards right should be corrected. --Shishir 17:35, 17 September 2017  Done thanks for your review, i hope i made decent edits 13:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Now OK --Shishir 3:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heteroconger luteolus, Yellow garden eel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

@A,Ocram: It has to be the best because it's the only one in the scope. Hashtag cheating. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 23:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

@Kong of Lasers: Yeah it is the only one in its scope, but i thought that's the reason why it's valuable. But if this is considered as cheating i could withdraw the nomination. I may also upload some more pictuers of these yellow garden eels that are crap. --A,Ocram

[chuckle] No, it's not cheating. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose No geocoding--Capricorn4049 (talk) 20:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I don't understand why it shouldn't be VI just because it's the only one in the scope?! For me clearly VI --Capricorn4049 (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now. It should be remembered that the labels are not allocated definitively. If in the future there are better images they can be put back into competition. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Spire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Guanaco 23:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turm des Schloss Český Krumlov bei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Judoc in Český Krumlov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harvard Yard im Sommer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs geocoing and better categorization -- Sixflashphoto 14:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)  Done--A,Ocram 11:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Good Quality Now -- Sixflashphoto 15:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Denkmal für Marko Gerbec.JPG

File:Denkmal für Marko Gerbec.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Breakers Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left not completely sharp. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kölnbreinspeicher, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done!! The Photographer Tue, 24 Apr 2018 02:00:44 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Brooklyn Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please can you remove a few dust spots. --Colin 20:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Manhattan skylines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sorry about the grey sky, good quality but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 21:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgkirche Hl. Johann Nepomuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Lindauer Leuchtturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but IMO it would be an improvement to crop all borders to emphasize the main object --Michielverbeek 20:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greyfriars Bobby Memorial Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI imo. --ArildV 21:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loggia Palace in detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Predjama castle, Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombus terrestris head in detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krypta Sagrat Cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blatt des Mammutblatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dragons on the Dragon Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christusstatue Temple Expiatori del Sagrat Cor Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höhlenburg Predjama, Slowenien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice picture, but: verticals should be vertical--> perspective correction required, please crop off the hut in the lower left corner --Isiwal 09:19, 24 June 2018 (UTC)  Commenthope i fixed it decently --A,Ocram 15:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, it would be nice if you included metadata --Trougnouf 21:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear A,Ocram,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhard Müller (talk) 20:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Custom House Tower in Boston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piran Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 17:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hafen in Piran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good overall quality, and I like the fact that you made the shot when a seagull was just taking off. -- Ikan Kekek 04:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washington Square Arch, New York.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted and it needs a perspective correction to get verticals in vertical position --Poco a poco 17:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)  Comment tried my best, not sure if it worked perfectly! --A,Ocram 20:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good job --Poco a poco 20:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Elms - Rhode Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monte Igueldo, San Sebastian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:13, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of the Puente de Vizcaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taj Mahal 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Marco - could you add locations where you took File:Mönchssittich.jpg, File:Monk parakeet.jpg, and File:Nest of Monk parakeets.jpg, please. It allows for their correct categorisation. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Sure! --A,Ocram (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt am Main 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktkirche Wiesbaden 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Albans Church Copenhagen 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 15:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torii, Fushimi Inari-Taisha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenryū-ji Garten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durchgang im Tenryū-ji Garten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omikuji, Sensō-ji, Tokyo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:43, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Albans Church Copenhagen 2019 Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinkaku in Kyoto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)  Support. We shouldn't overdo it by correcting perspectives, especially if the image matches the natural impression. For me, this picture is very good. -- Spurzem 19:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Perspektive stört nicht. --Alexander Leisser 09:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenborg Castle in Copenhagen2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think this needs perspective correction. Seven Pandas 23:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC) Tried to improve it. What you think? :) --A,Ocram 17:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Ok for me. --Milseburg 12:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byōdō-in, Phoenix Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kulturpalast (Warschau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks great until you see the bottom crop, not a QI to me like this --Poco a poco 17:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Partly blocked by a bus but still good to me. Feel free to oppose and change the status to Discuss. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Häuser am Marktplatz in Warschau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is really good quality, except the lower crop. Do you think you could crop the tops of those umbrellas? --Kritzolina 16:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)  Done sure; i tried to change it!--A,Ocram 13:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now, thank you! --Kritzolina 11:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Details of the front facade of the Basilica of Our Mother of Mercy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtburg von Maribor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction. Doing so the disturbing element in the top right will vanish. --Poco a poco 08:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC) tried to change it! --A,Ocram 17:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok, good enough now --Poco a poco 21:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the WTC Transportation Hub.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Albans Church Copenhagen in distance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstatt 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please expand the description? But good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC) Sure! Thanks alot for the review --A,Ocram 11:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

I have used one of your photos

Hello Marco!

I have used a photo of Cassiopea xamachana in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org)

You can see directly in the follow link:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=53744

If you wish, you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:

https://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Marco+Almbauer

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!

Regards!

Fernando Lisón, from Spain --Fernando.lison (talk) 04:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

cool nice to see! thanks for your message :). best wishes, from Austria A,Ocram (talk) 10:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moroccan tajine with meat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks delicious! If you can take a similar picture in which the whole dish is sharp, it might be a good Featured Picture candidate. -- Ikan Kekek 00:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Different fruits on a market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medersa Ben Youssef Madrasa Marrakesh 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wawel Cathedral 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medersa Ben Youssef Madrasa Marrakesh 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction required at the bottom. --Jsamwrites 18:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC) I tried to change it; do you think it is better now? --A,Ocram 09:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)  Support The new version looks fine. Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stara trta, Maribor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stara trta, Maribor 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lent (Maribor).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 11:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxon Fountain in Warsaw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nový most at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for a night shot --Tagooty 03:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)  Comment There are several dust spots that should be cloned out. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calcit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Synagoge (Krakau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul in Brno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)