User talk:5shot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 5shot!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:52, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

50.132.53.187 04:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 50.132.53.187, while I assume that you are User:5shot, next time you remove content from this talkpage, please log-in so that your edits are registred under your username. Otherwise, your edits may be reverted, as it is not appropriate to remove content from the talkpage of another user. --Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Categorization[edit]

Hi, you uploaded a lot of photos from the Flying Heritage Collection. Please do not use redundant categories as "Supermarine Spitfire" and "Supermarine Spitfire warbirds and preserved aircraft". Especially the categories for famous WWII aircraft are constantly in danger of 'overcrowding'. It would be nice if you could put the photos in the specialized categories. Thanks and cheers Cobatfor (talk) 15:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't use the redundant categories. They already were in existence so if figured since you folks who are in charge, wanted them to exist, or else you would have deleted them.

I have no axe to grind or care to be in charge of this or that. Makes no difference to me.

I however; do object to inferences that I am this or that or am doing this or that for whatever. Those criticisms, attitudes, and didactic notes, which have in the past bordered on slander, actually paint a very negative picture of the presenters.

I thought that Wiki media pedia would be above that, but it is what it is.

I am erasing much of the prior talk on this page.

I do not plan on making many more additions. It's to much trouble. 50.132.53.187 04:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]