User talk:50.82.40.97

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Coat of arms of the Rothschild Family[edit]

The coat of arms of the Barons Rothschilds is lacking the baronial coronet. The correct Germanic coronet should be a gold circlet beset with jewels, wrapped four times over by a string of pearls and have five large pearls sitting atop the circlet. 50.82.40.97 22:06, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feel you free to do this drawing in a separate files! I don't have time for this! And as you can see I name the file "Coat of arms of FAMILY" and not "Coat of arms of BARON". I based my work on this drawing : File:Rothschild Wappen.jpg, who doesn't show a baron crown. I just put the supporter in addition. My drawing is family not baron. Mathieu C. (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of Kate Middleton.svg[edit]

First off, you should have raised your concerns on the appropriate talk page File talk:Coat of Arms of Kate Middleton.svg. Secondly, since you appear to be completely ignorant of the legalities of heraldry, it would be much better for you to avoid crudely and heavy-handedly changing things you don't seem to understand very well. In conventional European and European-derived heraldry, the textual blazon is what is authoritative. Many different visual artistic renderings of the same textual blazon can all be equally acceptable realizations, and any artist who makes a new rendering of a coat of arms based on the textual blazon owns the copyright to his own particular rendering. AnonMoos (talk) 04:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If true, you need to go through the process of starting a conventional deletion nomination, and include your detailed concerns on the deletion nomination page, because your current edit-warring accomplishes nothing. AnonMoos (talk) 16:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]