User talk:2001:8003:5999:6D00:A97E:69D:5EBE:BC25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "This is ridiculous. I am pursuing a rightful deletion request and battling against a disruptive admin. The closure was illegal and I have a right to re-open it. That is not disruptive in any way (nor is it "unwise" as another admin claims) and I make formal request that this new block be revoked"
Decline reason: "DR already closed. Result was keep. The notability has been established. Re-nomination isn't going to change this. Disruptive editing by reverting several edits made by trusted users. This is called an edit war or wheel war. Conclusion: valid block. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
 (Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

2001:8003:5999:6D00:A97E:69D:5EBE:BC25 02:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing "illegal" about it and there is no "battling" going on here. It is not "ridiculous" either. Admins are trusted members of the community and they were elected by the community. If you want to counter a DR decision, consider reading our deletion policy and guide to appealing decisions in deletion discussions first. Masum Reza📞 02:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The closing admin is abusing his power. Therefore the method you said applies doesn't apply. I already protested on the admin noticeboard and was treated with contempt for no good reason. There is a battle going on. You need to look again. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:A97E:69D:5EBE:BC25 03:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your unblock request is a clear indication that you plan on continuing to treat this as a battleground that you must "win" at any cost. As I said on your AN post, undoing an admin action like that is not the way to contest a DR closure. Unblocking you will just allow you to continue to perform these disruptive edits. No admin will do that. You should take the week and familiarize yourself with our rules. If you come back afterwards and continue this behavior the next block will not expire anytime soon. --Majora (talk) 03:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2001:8003:5999:6D00:A97E:69D:5EBE:BC25&oldid=372091073"