User talk:178.176.146.22
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I see you nominated this image for deletion calling it "pedophilia". You do realize that we're dealing with a case of simple nudity here and I hardly see how one can say the image has any sexual overtones to it. You may wish to review COM:NUDITY. Tabercil (talk) 21:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- You may ask admin, I'm not sure. There is so much images whith naked boys and girls, there is need to delete some of them. 178.176.134.183 22:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Excuse me, I am an admin. As I said, simple nudity does not equal sexuality in my book. Tabercil (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- As Tabercil said, nudity is not the same as sexuality - someone can be naked without being sexual and sexual without being naked. I doubt you'll get many images, if any, deleted this way. Especially if all you do is request deletion with the reason "pedophilia". Please at least add some description as to why you believe this image is paedophilic. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Excuse me, I am an admin. As I said, simple nudity does not equal sexuality in my book. Tabercil (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Nudity is NOT pornography. Remind that. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 |
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. If you're concerned with privacy, registering also hides your IP address. [Google • Latest Global Edits (latestglobal) • rDNS • Geolocate (Alternate) • WHOIS • Proxy checker • Cross wiki contributions • Global blocks • Traceroute] · [RIRs: America • Europe • Africa • Asia-Pacific • Latin America/Caribbean] |