User talk:西安兵马俑

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 西安兵马俑!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:紫金山内部绿道示意图.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:紫金山内部绿道示意图.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 青海湖日出01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SH6188 00:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 茶卡盐湖天空之境02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 贵德的花02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I believe the species or at least genus of the flowers needs to be identified and included in the categories for Quality Image designation. -- Ikan Kekek 03:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know the genus it's Alcea, don't know the more detailed, I added it.--西安兵马俑 04:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Since you have Category:Malvales in China, Category:Flowers in China is COM:OVERCAT. I'll remove that this time and call this good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 茶卡盐湖湖面10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 茶卡盐湖天空之境03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 茶卡盐湖小火车03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harsh 2580 13:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 茶卡盐湖小火车04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add an English description. --Ermell 12:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have added.--西安兵马俑 13:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.Thanks. --Ermell 21:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 鼓楼夹江滨江步行道日落20220702 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The other photos have some problems with posterization that you might want to try to smooth out. This one is good enough, but please add relevant categories, like one for sunsets and one for jetties or whatever we're looking at. -- Ikan Kekek 04:22, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your suggestion.--西安兵马俑 04:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support You're most welcome. Thanks for nominating photos here. -- Ikan Kekek 09:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 莫愁湖20220529 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I feel like this is good enough to be a quality image, and it's a nice motif. Please add some more categories, though, for the boat (which looks like a long kayak to me) and the building, whatever we're looking at. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your suggestion. They are preparing for the upcoming race of the Dragon Boat Festival in June. This is the training ship.--西安兵马俑 13:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support That's good information. If you're so inclined, including an English-language description would be great. Thanks for the nomination and the additional categories. -- Ikan Kekek 07:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]