User talk:Юрий Д.К.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Юрий Д.К.!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr2Commons[edit]

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi! I prefer UploadWizard extension. It also allows to upload original-resolution files directly from Flickr (only for autopatrollers - up to 500 files) and blocks duplicate uploads (while F2C not always). But maybe I will use F2C for more massive downloads (above 500 files). Thank you! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Юрий Д.К., you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Patrick Ewing Flickr photostream[edit]

Hi Юрий Д.К. - please be careful with uploading these; a lot of the photos (and maybe all?) are license-washed from other sites and are highly likely not the photographer's own work. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Реклама[edit]

Здравствуйте! Вот напоролся на рекламу: https://www.flickr.com/photos/197690669@N03/albums/72177720306226973 Я этот весь альбом залил. Можно её как-нибудь ботом удалить и.т.п... Да будет цвет (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Дата[edit]

Здравствуйте!

Вы можете пройтись ботом, чтобы исправить дату?

User talk:Rost.galis Да будет цвет (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Пробел[edit]

В названиях этих фотографий отсутствует пробел:
File:Электропоезд Московского метро(52762302302).jpg
File:LeningradNovember 7 1976 (9585085741).jpg
File:LeningradNovember 7 1976 (9585085275).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9696516306).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9693287033).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9 1977 (10808918406).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9696516144).jpg

Hi Юрий Д.К., a request: would you, where applicable, please be so kind to add the {{Watermark}} tag to the David Zhang images you upload? They alle seem to contain credits in the image, which makes their use rather limited. Thanks for your understanding and regards, Wutsje 22:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunatelly, VFC doesn't work. I've requested bot owner's help Юрий Д.К 14:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Юрий Д.К., thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Killarnee (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of the old building of the Parliament of Georgia[edit]

Pictures of the old building of the Parliament of Georgia (https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=APwXEdcKGVKa8xPVmVo3IXyzqrlsI1aL1w:1686989582522&q=საქართველოს+პარლამენტის+ძველი+შენობა&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwir6bj27cn_AhVNVfEDHbvuCxEQ0pQJegQIChAB&biw=1920&bih=937&dpr=1#imgrc=hVi8E178Gi18mM). Wikipedia should add these pictures... Lasha-george (talk) 08:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

Please remember to use the most specific categories possible when uploading images, and do not dump large numbers of files in broad categories like Category:California. Doing so creates cleanup work for other editors. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming Flickr-imported files[edit]

Hey, when renaming files imported from Flickr, please keep the redirect, as it will help not to create duplicates. Flickr2Commons only identifies files with the exact same name, so if the redirect is deleted someone may cluelessly upload a file that is already on Commons. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've noticed that F2C doesn't detect duplicates when I try to download an album (detect only if file with exact name exist on Commons) but successfully detect them when I want to download an entire user's photoset or single image from Flickr (even if Commons file has another name). I think that we really need to enable duplicate detection in case of an album downloading. I've opened the theme on Commons talk:Flickr2Commons but still no response. Юрий Д.К 13:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr2Commons misuse[edit]

Despite warnings, you continue to misuse Flickr2Commons by uploading poor-quality images and files with poor titles, descriptions, and categorization. A sample from the last few days:

This is your final warning that you need to add useful filenames, descriptions, and categories to every single image you upload. (The filename and description on flickr are almost never useful - just leaving them is not acceptable.) If I see you continue to misuse Flickr2Commons in this manner, I will remove your access to the tool. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vienna?[edit]

Hi Юрий Д.К., any hint why this File:Poppyfield (25673110870).jpg should be in Vienna? And File:Pond (16360253634).jpg? Do you have location info? Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Flickr is user generated content. You cannot trust. We only trust in user generated content if originated from Wikipedians :-) Maybe you could try to contact Thomas Hirsch via Flickr and clarify this with him. If you cannot clarify the location in Vienna, maybe it is better to remove this cat and assign categories on what is to be seen on the image, like poppy fields (not poppy fields in Austria, again too specific) or whatever the poles in the pond are correctly called. Regarding Category:Vienna: Vienna is a beautiful place worth visiting. Even if you only do it based on google street view or one of the numerous images well categorized and assigned to Vienna already. It is a pain to cleanup such categories like Category:Vienna full of poorly described and categorized images, a pain I would like to share with you. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Birds of Scotland - subcategories[edit]

Hi Юрий Д.К. - please avoid making lots of minute subcategories Category:[Species] in Scotland, unless the species already has huge numbers of files (e.g. Cygnus olor); it is better instead to create Category:[Genus] in Scotland or Category:[Family] in Scotland, and keep the files in their relevant Category:[Species], so that {Geogroup} mapping for the species category shows the entire natural range of the species, rather than the [range - Scotland]. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • @MPF: Hi! Removing files from specific categories like "Pastor roseus in Scotland" and deleting categories with reason "Excessive subdivision of small parent category" (I don't remember such speedy deletion criteria) is not acceptable. See Modularity principle "file should be put in the most specific category". Also, I have no doubt that sooner or later we will still create categories like "Pastor roseus in Scotland" and later we will create "Pastor roseus in Glasgow", "Pastor roseus in Dumfries and Galloway" etc. due to large number of files. I think, we need to restore the categories. Regards. Юрий Д.К 20:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eventually, yes, in about a century, when there are enough suitable files! At the moment, it just makes files very difficult to find if you have to go through dozens of subcategories to reach them. The whole point of categorisation is to make finding files easy, not to make it difficult. When a category reaches 200 files, then is the time to think about suitable subcategories. Remember too, birds are natural objects; human political boundaries mean nothing to them. So when considering new subcategories within a species, look for plumage features, or similar, rather than dividing by artificial human boundaries. MPF (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Заброшенные сады недалеко от Кургана Бессмертия 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Заболоченный берег Красивой Мечи у Стрелецкого моста2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Берег р. Красивая Меча - Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot on the right --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Fixed, thank you. Юрий Д.К. 22:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Берег р. Красивая Меча - Ефремов4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Поля у р. Красивая Меча, Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Замёрзшая Красивая Меча, Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Старый дом на ул. Комсомольская. Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cuba - Cayo Coco.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cuba - Cayo Coco.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Азау-Гитче-Чегет-Карабаши.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Азау-Гитче-Чегет-Карабаши.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving[edit]

Hi,

All FP nominations should be archived, not deleted. Your mistake has been reverted by another user. Please do not erase useful content -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2018 - May - Salzach River at night in Salzburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018 - May - Salzach River at night in Salzburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russia, Mosca (5015462214).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

0x0a (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Категоризация[edit]

Пожалуйста, категоризируйте при загрузке Ваши работы точнее. Категоризация типа Крым это явно недостаточно. Спасибо.--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Раньше я так делал, теперь категоризирую лучше. Юрий Д.К 19:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Помогите разобрать фото Sergiy Galyonkin в категории Crimea. Геотегов нет, зацепок нет, я в замешательстве. Цель - в корневой категории Crimea не должно быть фото только подкатегории. Трифонов Андрей (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Хорошо, завтра гляну. Юрий Д.К 20:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Трифонов Андрей: Я исправил файлы, до которых Вы не добрались. Уже давно для всех своих загрузок, тем более для моих работ ставлю точные категории, насколько я могу это сделать. Эта партия крымских фото одна из последних с такими широкими категориями. Сейчас проверяю свои старые загрузки, чтобы добавить точные категории, имена файлов и описания (в основном анонимно). Иногда участники Фликр удаляют свои фото, поэтому раньше приходилось иногда загружать больше фото, но в ущерб категоризации. P.S. Моих работ в категории Крым нет, только загрузки. С уважением. Юрий Д.К 14:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Спасибо, с полсотни вместе растащили. Быстро захламляется после каждого лета Трифонов Андрей (talk) 14:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:We -3 Altruism (43694753704).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Красивая Меча в вечерних лучах солнца.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 15:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lovers on a beach (SD).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nosferattus (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Did you take my bikini? (52909604827).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aberdare National Park, Kenya - 51935134857.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 00:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]