User talk:Мельников

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Мельников!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Melnikov, I think I have developed a better version of your photo File:Uspenskiy sobor (Eniseysk).jpg. I ask for your permission to upload this one. Greetings --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Оk Michiel, I think you have developed my photo better than me. Thank you. Мельников (talk) 05:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Eniseisk.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Would be even better, if the white space under the coat of arms would be converted to transparent. --Cccefalon 03:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flag of Eniseysk.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Мельников,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Surroundings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 10:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dudarev, Pavel Ivanovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Республика Карелия[edit]

Коллега, оно, конечно оффициальное название, но категории на Викискладе созданы немного не с той целью, а для узнаваемости. И неоднократно здесь файлы были не прокатегоризированы именно потому, что пользователи искали "что-то in Karelia", а категория называлась "что-то in the Republic of Karelia". Так что был взят курс на постепенное переименование категорий "республика" в обычные. Надеюсь на понимание. Красный wanna talk? 11:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Мельников. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:11, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Streets in Krasnoyarsk Krai by name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kaganer (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Sukhobuzimsky District Map.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sukhobuzimsky District Map.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Taymura River Basin.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Taymura River Basin.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 04:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Plan-scheme of Viewing platform «Tsar-Ryba».jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plan-scheme of Viewing platform «Tsar-Ryba».jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klimenko Alexander.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 04:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taymura River Basin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 06:45, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

--Xunks (talk) 07:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Montages_of_Achinsk has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:4D38:241D:8636:E9D9 15:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Хомушку.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 12:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of Category:Urban okrugs of the Sakha Republic to Category:Urban okrugs of Sakha Republic[edit]

Здравствуйте, Мельников. Для участника с "intermediate level of English" не совсем понятно почему вы переименовываете Category:Urban okrugs of the Sakha Republic в Category:Urban okrugs of Sakha Republic.

Ваши правки (без каких-либо объяснений причин переименования) в данной категории я откатил обратно. Russian Rocky (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Russian Rocky (talk · contribs), даже с моим, как Вы отметили "intermediate level of English", я конечно же знаю, что по правилам английского языка здесь ставится определенный артикль «the». Проблема только в том, что английский язык уже давно стал международным, и Википедия это тоже международный проект. Для категоризации огромных объемов данных этот артикль никому не нужен, более того - неудобен и вреден.

Если вы продолжите отмалчиваться и исправлять правильные английские названия категорий на безграмотные, то в следующий раз мне уже придется обратиться к администраторам Викисклада.

— Russian Rocky (обсуждение) 20:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

.

Это Ваше право. Кроме того, я думаю, что это будет самым разумным решением с Вашей стороны - сделать это как можно скорее. С уважением, Мельников (talk) 04:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: Я заметил, что вы не только прошлись в категориях о Якутии (Сахе), но и в категориях об Алтайской республике. Так, например, вами была создана категория Category:Culture of Altai Republic, а уже существующую старую категорию Category:Culture of the Altai Republic вы исправили на перенаправление (diff1). Вас даже не смутило то, что английская категория называется Category:Culture of the Altai Republic.

Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что "Altai Republic"‎, "Republic of Karelia‎", "Sakha Republic"‎ всегда имеют перед собой английский артикль "the".

Если вы продолжите отмалчиваться и исправлять правильные английские названия категорий на безграмотные, то в следующий раз мне уже придется обратиться к администраторам Викисклада.--Russian Rocky (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Проблема только в том, что английский язык уже давно стал международным, и Википедия это тоже международный проект. Для категоризации огромных объемов данных этот артикль никому не нужен, более того - неудобен и вреден.

— Мельников (talk) 04:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

То что английские артикли "неудобны и вредны" лично для вас, не отменяет того, что для англоговорящих участников они важны. Категории на Викискладе называются на английском языке (это официальная политика Викисклада, см. Commons:Language policy). Не надо говорить за всех, утверждая, что артикли никому не нужны, и продвигать ломаный английский на хранилище образовательного (!) медиаконтента (см. Commons:Добро пожаловать).

У вас была возможность создать нужные вам перенаправления с помощью {{category redirect}}, но вы предпочли устроить войну артиклям в английских названиях категорий. Я уже привел выше пример с Category:Culture of the Altai Republic, когда вы умышленно исправили Category:Culture of the Altai Republic на Category:Culture of Altai Republic (исправляли все основательно, пройдясь в том числе и на Викиданных: diff2). Причем, вас даже не смутило название категории в английской Википедии.

В результате ваша война с английскими артиклями затронула множество категорий и прибавила работы другим участникам. Если вы и после нашей дискуссии продолжите эту неконструктивную деятельность, то мне придется обратиться к администраторам Викисклада. Я серьезно.

P.S.: Попробуйте для начала объяснить участникам Викисклада из США, что артикль "the" перед United States никому не нужен из-за "категоризации огромных объемов данных". Для убедительности можете начать прямо сейчас переименовывать категории с "the United States" на "United States", но я абсолютно уверен, что ваша деятельность будет быстро пресечена (ведь это не русские категории на Викискладе переименовывать, до которых нет никому дела, кроме нас с вами).--Russian Rocky (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо. Согласен с Вами. В следующий раз буду делать перенаправление. Мельников (talk) 04:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]