User talk:Á/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Template:Delete/doc has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anthonywriter (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Delete/doc has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anthonywriter (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Delete/doc has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anthonywriter (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Kit body jako green uppersnake on black.png

Sorry, I can't understand why you had deleted this file. 38x39 pixel is the normal size of kit bodies. All kit bodies have this sizes. There are hundreds or thousands of them. And this file was in use several times. --Undeviginti (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm indeed sorry. I didn't understand the special nature of this file. /á(!) 13:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Then please look for using of files, before deletion in future. Greets. --Undeviginti (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Postimerkit ennen 1990

Hei! En oikein tiedä keneltä tarkemmin kysyä, mutta kun sain selville, että sinä olet luonut Finland-Stamp-mallineen ja kirjoittanut myös tekijänoikeutta koskevat asiat postimerkeistä, niin lienet oikea taho. Haluaisin kysyä, mihin tuo viranomaispykälän tulkinta oikein perustuu eli miten Posti- ja telelaitoksen julkaisemat postimerkit ovat osa viranomaisen päätöstä ja siten tekijänoikeudesta vapaata? Tämä tuntuu poikkeavan kokonaan muun Euroopan tilanteesta, missä melkein kaikkialla muualla postimerkit ovat tekijänoikeuden suojaamia.

Tekijänoikeuslain 9 §:n mukaan 1 momentti ei koske itsenäisiä teoksia, jotka sisältyvät momentissa mainittuihin asiakirjoihin, ja lisäksi on tulkinnanvaraista, onko julkaistu postimerkki erityisesti viranomaisen päätös tai lausuma. Lain esitöiden mukaan päätöksillä ja lausumilla tarkoitetaan kirjallisia tahdonilmauksia ja lausumia, ja tekijänoikeuskomitea on katsonut, että päätöksinä ja lausumina ei pidetä muun muassa karttoja tai merikortteja. Mielelläni näkisin tarkemmat perustelut sille, että nuo postimerkit todellakin ovat vapaita ja että ne voidaan lisensoida tänne Commonsiin vapaasti hyödynnettäviksi. --Pxos (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Pistin keskustelun alulle myös suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa tekijänoikeuskahvihuoneeseen. --Pxos (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Teen asiasta lausuntopyynnön tekijänoikeusneuvostolle, niin saadaan selvyys tähän. --Pxos (talk) 19:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Kommenttia muutettu 24.4.2013. --Pxos (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Kirjataan tähän tiedoksi, etten ole tehnyt mitään lausuntopyyntöä. --Pxos (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Please sync this with Template:PD-Mexico/en and keep an eye on it for the next few days as I may be changing it. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Ciluxo (new talk)

--Ciluxo (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC)http://zsk.bz/Qty

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)