User:Yann/Quality images/2017-2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2017[edit]

Graffitis aux Grottes, Genève[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffitis aux Grottes, Genève .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little soft, but good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 01:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Salle informatique de la bibliothèque d'Art et d'Archéologie de Genève[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salle informatique de la bibliothèque d'Art et d'Archéologie de Genève.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Statue du Général Dufour, place Neuve[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue du Général Dufour, place Neuve, Genève.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted and some dust spots in the sky, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 14:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Dust spots removed. I don't think it is tilted. What should be vertical is vertical. Yann 18:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 Support. --Basotxerri 19:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Sarajevo Mosque, Bosnia[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosquée de Sarajevo, Bosnie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The information on the rope below is disturbing but the rest is of good quality to me.--Famberhorst 16:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Bahadur Singh[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahadur Singh, Jaura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

2018[edit]

Adivasi children from Saharia tribe in Mara village[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adivasi children from Saharia tribe in Mara village, Morena district.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Bana making chapatis[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bana making chapatis, Mara village, Morena district, MP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Villagers of Mara[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villagers of Mara, Morena district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Aneesh Thillenkery[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aneesh Thillenkery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Old man with a baby girl[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old man with a baby girl, Morena district.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:17, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Girls in Mara village[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girls in Mara village, Morena district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Girl in Mara village[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girl in Mara village, Morena district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Man with a white moustache[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man with a white moustache, Morena district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Boys in Mara village[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boys in Mara village, Morena district, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Well done!! The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 02:02:09 GMT

Gold plated Buddha, Shanti Stupa, Leh[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gold plated Buddha, Shanti Stupa, Leh, Ladakh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The circumference could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Lampion, Apple Garden restaurant, Leh[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lampion, Apple Garden restaurant, Leh, 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The file is on the small side. But good quality for me and a nice shot.--Famberhorst 15:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Niri-La Ladakh Guest House[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niri-La Ladakh Guest House, Leh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Rainbow from Rohtang pass road[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainbow from Rohtang pass road, 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Really intrusive arm at the bottom right corner, very distracting, see Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Composition_and_lighting --Basile Morin 01:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC) OOPS. Right, I cropped that out. Yann 19:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 00:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Military truck convoy of the Indian Army on the Manali-Leh Highway[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Military truck convoy on the Manali-Leh Highway.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Less shaky than the other one, and good detail --Daniel Case 23:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Shanti Stupa, Leh[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanti Stupa, Leh, 20180814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo seems slightly overworked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 04:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Gare frontalière serbe avec la République de Macédoine[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare frontalière serbe avec la République de Macédoine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Rainbow from Rohtang pass road, Manali–Leh Highway[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainbow from Rohtang pass road, 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainbow from Rohtang pass road, 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Processing of pashmina wool, Leh[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Processing of pashmina wool, Leh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:29, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Agra Fort description[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra Fort description, English.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight distortion top right but good enough. --Peulle 22:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra Fort description, Hindi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Ghaznin Gate description, Agra Fort[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghaznin Gate description, Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Tomb of Imam Zamin inscription, Qutb Minar complex[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of Imam Zamin inscription, Delhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Hall of public audience description, Agra Fort[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hall of public audience description, Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Grocery store and restaurant, Istanbul[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Food shop, Istanbul, July 2018 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 11:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Ferry in Istanbul[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferry in Istanbul, 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

We are half of the world[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! We are half of the world.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:54, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Jan Andolan 2018[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Andolan 2018, near Gwalior 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not the best light, but the light is not the point, and it gets its point across --Daniel Case 17:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Videos of Jan Andolan 2018[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Andolan 2018, 2.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Another good short clip --Daniel Case 17:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Andolan 2018, 3.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A good short clip like you'd see on TV --Daniel Case 17:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Boys in Mara village, Morena district, M.P.[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boys in Mara village, Morena district, M.P.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

2019[edit]

Iran[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains in northern Iran 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains in central Iran 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

2022[edit]

Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restauration de l'abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 2022-06, 9296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps a left crop for better balance might be considered but otherwise good quality. --Peulle 11:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Done, but please note the sculpture is not really symmetric. Yann 12:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cassis en fruit à Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, juin 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahlia at Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 2022-06, 9217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restauration de l'abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 2022-06, 9371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roses at Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 06-2022, 9212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toits de la maire de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, juin 2022, 9204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama plafond de l'abbatiale de Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye, 9734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 21:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fronton de l'abbaye de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rose at Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 06-2022, 9214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toits de la maire de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, juin 2022, 9205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 7, tableau, 9691 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 7, statue de Sainte Thérèse de Lisieux, 9693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 7, statue de saint Benoît, 9694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 7, mur est, 9692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 1, cible mur ouest, 9414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:35, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collection du musée de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment good image but more categories needed. --MB-one 21:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC) Done. Yann 21:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 2, mur ouest, 9484 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 2, bas du mur est, 9424 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collection du musée de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collection du musée de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collection du musée de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 Comment Poor description. --Palauenc05 09:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 1, vitrail ouest, 9479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 1, vitrail nord, 9478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:51, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 1, bas-relief nord, 9408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collection du musée de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collection du musée de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, 9861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 5, statue de la Vierge, 9674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapelle 1, baptistère, 9406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

2023[edit]

Vercors[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pas des Voûtes, Vercors, France 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 13:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pas des Voûtes, Vercors, France 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Devoluy[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brèche de Faraut, Dévoluy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brèche de Faraut, Dévoluy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tête de Claudel, Dévoluy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tête de Girbault, Dévoluy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade sur le ruisseau des Auberges, le Glaizil 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade sur le ruisseau des Auberges, le Glaizil 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Carcassonne[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument à la mémoire de Joseph Poux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Level of detail could be better, but still ok for a QI --Jakubhal 05:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Champsaur[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallée de la Séveraissette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallée de la Séveraissette sous la neige 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallée de la Séveraissette sous la neige 01 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Vieux Chaillol depuis le col du Cendrié.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col du Cendrié, vue sur le Pic de la Saume et le Vieux Chaillol 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de la Saume, Champsaur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)