User:Pfctdayelise/test

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

License:GFDL

License:GFDL




<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript1.2" src="http://www.altavista.com/help/free/inc_translate"></script> <noscript><a href="http://www.altavista.com/babelfish/tr"></noscript>


Copy and paste the name of the image you wish to nominate into this box (including the Image: prefix):


  • PAGENAME: Pfctdayelise/test
  • BASEPAGENAME: Pfctdayelise
  • SUBPAGENAME: test








COM:DG flowchart[edit]

1. what do you want deleted?

  • a. Category (go to 2)
  • b. Template (go to 3)
  • c. Article/gallery (go to 4)
  • d. Media file including images (go to 5)
  • e. A group of related files e.g. in a certain category, on an article or uploaded by one user (go to 6)

2. Why do you want it deleted?

  • a. I created it by mistake, it has a spelling mistake or it is unused and is unlikely to be used -> {{speedy|reason}}
  • b. It is a reasonable name, but the contents are all elsewhere (e.g. Category:Cars/Category:Automobiles) -> Make it a category redirect to stop people creating it by accident in the future. {{category redirect|new category name}} (no "Category:" prefix)
  • c. I want to move it to a better name -> Orgullobot info
  • d. It is a controversial/useless/stupid classification that is being used, but I want to stop that -> {{Delete}} and list on COM:DEL.

3. Why do you want it deleted?

  • a. I created it by mistake, it has a spelling mistake or it is unused and is unlikely to be used -> {{speedy|reason}}
  • b. It already exists under another name -> make it a redirect if it is used (#REDIRECT [[Template:New template name]]), or otherwise request speedy deletion.
  • c. It is a copyright tag but the basis for its claims is wrong, so the images using it are copyright violations -> {{Tfd}} (template for deletion) and list on COM:DEL. Also mention on Commons talk:Licensing, these claims need to be investigated thoroughly.

4. Why do you want it deleted?

  • a. It looks like nonsense, spam, a copy of an article from Wikipedia, it is mostly text, there are no/few images -> {{speedy|reason}}
  • b. It already exists as another name, possibly in another language -> make it a redirect (#REDIRECT [[New page name]])

5. Why do you want it deleted?

  • I accidentally uploaded it under a bad name (badname)
  • I uploaded the wrong file (upload new one if account > 4 days, or else list on COM:HD)
  • I discovered two files that are the exact same (duplicate)
  • I discovered two files where one is a smaller version of the other (duplicate)
  • I discovered two files that show the same thing, including paintings, SVG flags (superseded, don't delete - if deletion wanted, list on COM:DEL)
  • I found out it is a copyright violation (go to 7)
  • It doesn't have enough source and/or licensing information (go to 8)
  • Another reason including quality, objectionable content -> ({{Delete}} and list on COM:DEL)

6. Mass deletion requests should always be listed on COM:DEL so that they are more visible to administrators as a group. If a user is uploading copyvios, they can be warned/educated and if they continue they should be blocked by an administrator. If you believe a copyright tag (template) has a wrong basis and all the images using it are copyvios, see 3c.

7. How do you know it is a copyright violation?

  • copied from another wikimedia project and has been deleted there/is under a non-free license there -> speedy
  • it's extremely unreasonable that the uploader holds the copyright or has obtained the right permission ('obvious copyvios) -> {{Copyvio}}
  • the main object of the image is a copyrighted object or logo -> COM:DEL
  • it's a screenshot of a computer or TV or similar device
  • I looked at the source and it says it is copyrighted
  • It looks like it was just grabbed off the internet
  • There is no reason to believe the license is correct (go to 8)

8. What information is missing?

  • There is no license given
  • the license given is not believable
  • there is no proof that this license applies
  • there is no source
  • the source given is not believable (eg PD-self)


hide/show[edit]

testing toggleable show/hide buttons!

I pared it down to this...