User:Martinvl/Promotions 2021

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphne du Maurier's study (reconstruction).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful, but from the photo, this is a reconstruction of her study, so I believe that's what the scope should be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek:  Done

---

Scope changed from Daphne du Maurier's study to Daphne du Maurier's study (reconstruction) --Martinvl (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphne du Maurier's study (reconstruction).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful, but from the photo, this is a reconstruction of her study, so I believe that's what the scope should be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek:  Done

---

Scope changed from Daphne du Maurier's study to Daphne du Maurier's study (reconstruction) --Martinvl (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merlin's Cave, Tintagel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. I fixed your scope - "Category" shouldn't be visible in the nomination, remember. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Explanation of ISO 8601 date format.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would call that Chinese-style date abbreviation, not "language-independent". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek: Response to Ikan here Martinvl (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
African bush elephant footprints.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I agree. None of the others have anything to show scale for comparison. They could be 10 cm or 100cm. Now we can judge. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose It may be obvious, but scope should specify species. The relative size is less value than showing clear prints - the other images in the category are more valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm guessing since the location is Botswana, it isn't an African Forest Elephant because they are not indigenous to that country. I doubt it was on holiday, so it must be an African Bush Elephant and that would be a valid scope since the other named images are of the bush elephant. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Elephant footprints to African bush elephant footprints --Martinvl (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

@Rodhullandemu and Charlesjsharp: Please note that I have changed the scope of this image. Martinvl (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Still happy to  Support. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope still as before... Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Info@Charlesjsharp: Change of scope completed. Martinvl (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Rod. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front facade of the Lion and Lamb House, Farnham.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlisle Cathedral South Portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Francis Close, Carlisle Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful. But I do not see the image in en: Francis Close -- Spurzem (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern aspect of the Lanercost Priory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support But a little vertical correction would be nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medina Terrace, Hove from the seafront.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, as I take it File:2–8 Medina Terrace, Hove (NHLE Code 1298644).JPG, a fuller picture of the building, is not taken from the seafront. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek: You are quite right. Only the balcony of No 8 overlooks the sea, the other balconies have a view that is parallel to the beach. Martinvl (talk) 19:30, 20 July 2021

Just to confirm, camera was pointing NW; sea was due S; sea-wall ran E-W and was 5 metres behind the camera. Martinvl (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

(UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)