User:F. Riedelio/Quality Image Promotion/2021/2021 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion 2021, Teil 2[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 14 002 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 028 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 16 002 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 013 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK but significantly downsized from what the camera is capable of. Do you have the full resolution available?--Peulle 10:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
@Peulle: ✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC) Yup.--Peulle 12:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 16 003 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurgartenstraße 05 002 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurgartenstraße 07 (an) 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 002 2016 06 09 Hecken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 001 2010 08 13 Draufsichten auf Fahrzeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Technically OK. --Augustgeyler 18:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 002 2015 04 23 Draufsichten auf Fahrzeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 14 003 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurpark Zürgelbaum 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kurgartenstraße 10 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 001 2015 06 08 Hecken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Resolution could be better. --XRay 18:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 004 2021 11 15 Hecken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better, for example with f/7.1 or f/8. --XRay 18:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 002 2005 08 30 Staedte in der Daemmerung und im Morgengrauen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good Quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 04 19 010 Rheinufer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 003 2019 09 27 Zaeune und Grenzmauern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 001 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 004 2020 01 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 005 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 004 2020 01 23 Zaeune und Grenzmauern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 007 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 002 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The sharpness decreases strongly towards the left side. Fixable? --Ermell 19:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 20:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Bäckerstraße 10 006 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Category for timber framing would be useful. --Ermell 20:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
@Ermell: Thanks for the review. The category "Bäckerstraße 10 (Handorf)" is included in the category "Timber framed brick houses in Lüneburg County". --F. Riedelio 07:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 007 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 23:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Scheune 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 004 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 006 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 007 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 008 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 001 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 003 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 006 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Golden 08:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Wohngebäude 001 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The gable is unfortunately very blurred. Fixable? --Ermell 09:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Dunkle Straße 2 004 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The same problems with the gable as in the other picture. --Ermell 09:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 32 004 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 32 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 34 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 004 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 22:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 011 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 014 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 015 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 57 017 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 78 001 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 78 002 2021 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 78 004 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße Kriegerdenkmal 001 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 32 001 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI for me. --C messier 19:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 07 Scheune 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße Kriegerdenkmal 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 14 007 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 13:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße 32 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Lüneburger Weg 9 005 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Lüneburger Weg 9 006 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Marschwegel 7 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße Turm 001 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 10:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
@Augustgeyler: Thanks for the review. The tower tapers pyramidal towards the top. Perhaps this creates the impression of a perspective distortion. --F. Riedelio 19:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 Question Why is the right side of that tower leaning more in than the left side? --Augustgeyler 23:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ New version --F. Riedelio 10:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. The tower is clearly built crooked. All you have to do is look at the outer wooden boards. --Steindy 16:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handorf Hauptstraße Turm 002 2021 06 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It might be tilted ccw a little bit and it needs a perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 10:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
@Augustgeyler: Thanks for the review. The tower tapers pyramidal towards the top. Perhaps this creates the impression of a perspective distortion. --F. Riedelio 19:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 Question Why is the right side of that tower leaning more in than the left side? --Augustgeyler 23:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
✓ Answered The vertical alignment was made on the church in the background. --F. Riedelio 09:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. The tower is clearly built crooked. All you have to do is look at the outer wooden boards. --Steindy 16:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)