User:Dschwen/translate

File:Würzburger Residenz, Gartenfront.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2010 at 17:08:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Würzburger Residenz, Gartenfront.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Würzburger Residenz, Gartenfront.jpg

48

1155

792

30

5000

1191

Appears to be some mirroring/duplication.

•  Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert
•  Neutral -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Nice. Shame about the radio masts at the far left, but they're not conspicuous enough to mark it down (suppose they could be edited out, but then the pic wouldn't reflect reality . . . can someone go and demolish them? ;-) MPF (talk) 18:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

   Doing… Jafeluv (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

•  Support. Very nice picture, and neither the radio masts nor the window cleaner on the left distracts enough to withdraw my support. Jafeluv (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Question - In the bottom left corner, in the lawn and some of the flowers, there seems to be some mirroring or duplication going on. It kind of looks like a reflection from water, but there doesn't appear to be an actual pond there. Maybe an artifact from the stitching process? Very minor overall, just wondering if it is something that could possibly be fixed. Sdgjake (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

  Hallo Sdgjake, ich kann leider kein Englisch. In diesem Bildbereich war tatsächlich ein Fehler. Ich habe nun eine neue Version hochgeladen, und hoffe, dass diese besser ist. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

  Ist immernoch da. Same problem persists. My guess: Image data was simply missing and was mirrored there to fill the hole. Oh and Google translation of this page. --Dschwen (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

  I don't see anything wrong there either. There's a gap in the flowerbed, but given the presence of three other such gaps (one barely visible on the opposite side in the lower right corner, two clearly visible below the eleventh window from the left and right end of the building respectively), I assume it's an actual feature of the scene. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

  ...oh, I see it now in the old version. Perhaps you just had that version stuck in your browser cache, Dschwen? —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 04:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

  Yep, amateur mistake ;-) --Dschwen (talk) 11:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

   Support -- Looks awesome. Sdgjake (talk) 21:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 08:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Takabeg (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Dschwen (talk) 11:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX  ^talk  22:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 12:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Memorino (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Avenue (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support   • Richard • [®] • 20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture