User:ComputerHotline/Archive 15

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-17 09-35-30-saut-truite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --Rjcastillo 20:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-23 16-21-05-grande-cascade-tendon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-23 16-05-52-grande-cascade-tendon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice and QI.--Cj.samson 13:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-30 23-37-49-paysage-au-clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-30 23-30-25-paysage-au-clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --A.Savin 11:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-23 15-55-23-grande-cascade-tendon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mystical. --Mattbuck 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-23 15-50-33-grande-cascade-tendon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. --Mattbuck 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-02 09-25-59-neige.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very!! good quality. --A.Savin 14:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-05 14-34-28-Aretaon asperrimus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. But I promise you other users will change my assesment to discuss or decline because of "too shallow DoF". I think DoF is OK here, a head portrayal of an insect. Not the whole body must be sharp. --Tuxyso 21:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-11-30 23-50-03-paysage-au-clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 13:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-10 22-25-52-Alcea-rosea-graines-46f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-16 22-41-13-Pinus-pinea-27f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Je ne suis pas sûr que proposer une perspective sur l'échelle soit une très bonne idée (où doit-on prendre la mesure, en haut ou en bas de la réglette ?), but very good and useful QI anyway.--Jebulon 18:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC) À vrai dire, peu importe. Ça joue sur 2 ou 3 millimètres. --ComputerHotline 19:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-15 21-37-30-Alcea-rosea-14f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it is a QI--Jebulon 18:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-15 13-00-02-Gleditsia-triacanthos-30f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-15 11-27-39-entrepot-ferr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-15 11-03-15-entrepot-ferr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-11 11-59-11-soleil-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The color assigned to the (monochromatic) picture is a bit weird. Red/orange would be a better choice than magenta. --Jastrow 20:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC) I think magenta is not unusual. Mattbuck 14:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-11 11-55-31-soleil-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-10 21-09-29-viola-tricolor-graines-38f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A tad to shiny perhaps, but good quality nonetheless. --Jastrow 20:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-10 22-13-42-Lunaria-annua-graines-25f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good work. It lacks the scale --Archaeodontosaurus 15:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-08 11-39-12-glace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF not optimum, but QI--Jebulon 16:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-08 22-33-15-terril-28f-focus-stacking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very didactic !--Jebulon 16:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-08 11-29-34-neige.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --A.Savin 19:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-08 11-30-36-neige.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Jebulon 16:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-05 14-35-08-Aretaon asperrimus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly dark, but OK for QI. --A.Savin 11:24, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-05 14-31-28-Aretaon asperrimus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-20 14-56-28-gouttes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 16:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-24 14-53-49-crinoidea-sp-109f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 22:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-24 14-47-10-crinoidea-sp-75f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 11:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-02 17-31-34-mold-60f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 21:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-05 22-50-27-comp-elec-40f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-05 22-30-58-comp-elec-22f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! Martin Falbisoner 10:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-05 22-37-53-comp-elec-72f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! Martin Falbisoner 10:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-01 00-18-19-fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty, but I'm not quite convinced.  Weak support I suppose. Mattbuck 10:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-31 21-10-15-orion-taurus-5c-25im-21d-27o-ann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-26 12-44-44-p7100-dcr-250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 03:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-12 12-04-43-osez-le-debat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunate expression, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-12-31 21-10-15-orion-taurus-5c-25im-21d-27o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-17 12-41-54-neige-15f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment how come it has so greenish-bluish color? Kruusamägi 18:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-17 11-39-45-neige-17f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 20:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-17 12-43-45-neige-13f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-17 12-42-19-neige-12f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It would probably look better with more contrast and a darker background, but ok. --Mattbuck 05:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-17 12-40-43-neige-19f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 05:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-24 18-09-34-Coconut-10f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-20 09-00-01-glace-3f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mattbuck 15:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-24 18-32-45-orange-8f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-24 18-34-06-fruit-10f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 16:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-20 13-22-58-sel-29f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 06:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-20 15-16-23-verglas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'll assume what might be a dust spot is actually an impurity. --Mattbuck 06:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-01-31 15-19-09-noisetier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-02-03 16-11-09-arbres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-02-03 15-51-49-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 8 February (UTC)