User:ComputerHotline/Archive 14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-13 15-37-31-sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. My Dad would approve. --Mattbuck 11:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-13 21-06-32-auto-light-trails.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-12 16-13-03-musee-histoire-belfort-denfert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now.--Jebulon 09:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-12 16-11-09-musee-histoire-belfort-artilleur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now--Jebulon 09:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-12 16-22-28-musee-histoire-belfort-clairon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Think, the Picture with the border is the better one --CChris 18:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)...But both are too yellow...--Jebulon 22:21, 15 October 2012 (UTC) Yellow cast correction uploaded. Yann 08:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Good now--Jebulon 09:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-12 16-29-38-musee-histoire-belfort-medailles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-51-52-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-18 17-17-29-egl-st-christ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 19:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear ComputerHotline,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Emplilement[edit]

Tu prends trop de photo pour tes empilements. Le nombre d'erreur est proportionnel au nombres de photo. Pour ce sujet tu dois passer facilement avec moins de 10 Photo, avec le matériel et les réglages que tu as fais. Essai tu vas voir çà marche.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Tout dépend de la PDC. Avec le D300 + 105 macro, elle est très courte. Donc il faut de nombreuses photos. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
non éclaire plus et ferme à F15 si tu veux mais tes paramètres sont bons.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
si je ferme au-delà de f/11, les taches sur le capteurs apparaissent. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Je ne connais pas le D300 mais c'est un bon capteur. Fait des essai et fies toi à ton oeil. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gustave Courbet - Le Château de Chillon - Musée des Beaux-Arts de Belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-36-23-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Änderung der Kategorien - Fotos[edit]

Hallo ComputerHotline,

weshalb verschiebst du eindeutig identifizierbare Fotos verschiedener Libellen z.B. nach Category:Unidentified Zygoptera? Mache ich etwas verkehrt, dann teile es mir bitte mit. Eventuell sollen eindeutig bestimmte Arten ja nur in die Kategorie des jeweiligen Artnamen liegen? MfG --Andreas Thomas Hein (talk) 06:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-25 16-23-44-Amanita-muscaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice--Holleday 19:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-25 16-22-16-Amanita-muscaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice--Holleday 19:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-22 14-34-19-egl-nd-bas-ronchamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 15-39-03-cath-st-christophe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically good. Basvb 18:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-18-19-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Rjcastillo 20:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-02-21-cath-st-christophe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 22-55-54-seloncourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ground blur is unfortunate, but expected. Perhaps in future you could just include one ground exposure. --Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leptoglossus occidentalis - 2012-10-20 12-17-43-hemiptera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-20 17-26-07-solar-prominences.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 10:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-20 21-28-23-lightpainting-cerap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks for the note about what CERAP was. --Mattbuck 14:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-37-35-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-41-49-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. --Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jean Barthold Jongkind - Le Port de Rotterdam (mba Belfort).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Big frame for a small painting. --Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-58-05-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-59-33-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Mural del Gernika.jpg[edit]

Hi ComputerHotline, thank you for your contributions to detect copyvios. This picture, however, isn't one as it is covered by freedom of panorama (see the {{FoP-Spain}} template at the bottom of the file description). And speedy deletions are not appropriate where we had already a regular deletion request which was closed with a keep (see here). Such pointers to DRs are on the talk page of a file. If there is one, this should be checked for. I've undone the speedy deletion request. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-22 14-40-55-egl-nd-bas-ronchamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That's a pulpit? From what angle? --Mattbuck 17:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-31-22-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-19 16-56-04-musee-beaux-arts-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-06 10-30-06-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-06 10-11-26-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Rjcastillo 19:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-06 10-13-27-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --The Photographer 18:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-06 09-57-49-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality (FP perhaps?). --Jastrow 17:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-06 10-25-48-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-25 20-41-01-waxing-gibbous-moon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2012-11-06 09-57-49-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2012-11-06 09-57-49-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-29-07-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 08:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-29-50-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI. - A.Savin 11:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-16-45-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-53-15-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-34-22-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 14:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-37-35-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 13:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-32-16-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise, but acceptable for QI. - A.Savin 13:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-57-29-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wrong file name, but very good, even if a less distractive background (masking ?) would help, IMO.--Jebulon 17:48, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-06 10-27-39-fort-du-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments well done --The Photographer 17:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-15 11-30-00-physalis-25f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Selbymay 13:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-14 17-51-09-file-auto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Esquilo 15:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-13 12-47-06-nocloseup-wcu-wcu16f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, interesting, and useful for opium. You know that detention of this is forbidden in France ? ;) I'm kidding... Very good job !--Jebulon 17:27, 14 November 2012 (UTC) Only flower are useful for opium. Not seeds. --ComputerHotline 14:53, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-10 10-07-19-musee-histoire-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and maybe Valued --The Photographer 13:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-17 10-01-45-cascade-goutte-ullysse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-16 16-00-31-vallee-doller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice view! --Slaunger 12:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-11-16 15-06-41-saut-truite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hmmm. Looks very beatiful, nice DOF and illumination, but it appears to be heavily  Oversaturated for me, especially in the red channel. I suppose the leaves should be brown, but they look very red? --Slaunger 12:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC) There is not post-processing (saturation or other). Maybe an effect created by the polarizant filter. --ComputerHotline 15:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Amazing, no postprocessing. Well in that case, promote. --Slaunger 16:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)