User:Antoine.01/Archief2021
<< Back to the user talk page...
Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid[edit]
Dag, Antoine.01. Is er een verschil tussen Institute for Sound and Vision en Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision? Ik denk het eigenlijk niet, en ik denk dan ook dat de eerste categorie overbodig is – zou je er nog eens naar willen kijken? Groet, Eissink (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC).
- Ha Eissink, Je heb gelijk ik had hier kennelijk overheen gekeken. Inmiddels heb ik de categorieën overgeheveld naar Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. Wel laat ik Institute for Sound and Vision bestaan mochten er nog andere landen zijn die zoiets dergelijks ook hebben dan kunnen die daar ook aangekoppeld worden. Vr. gr.
Antoine.01
overleg(Antoine) 16:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ik denk dat er beter een doorverwijzing van kan worden gemaakt, in elk geval zolang er geen andere instituten van die naam zijn. Nu gebruik je het als overkoepelende categorie in afwachting van instituten in andere landen, maar je hebt 'm wel in "Archives in the Netherlands" etc. geplaatst. Daarbij wek je ook de indruk dat de "Netherlands Inst." een onderdeel is van het "Institute". Het lijkt me beter om Neth. Inst. in de categorie Archives in the Netherlands etc. te plaatsen. Eissink (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC).
- Ja misschien beter, er is inmiddels een doorverwijzing van gemaakt! Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 17:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ja misschien beter, er is inmiddels een doorverwijzing van gemaakt!
- Ik denk dat er beter een doorverwijzing van kan worden gemaakt, in elk geval zolang er geen andere instituten van die naam zijn. Nu gebruik je het als overkoepelende categorie in afwachting van instituten in andere landen, maar je hebt 'm wel in "Archives in the Netherlands" etc. geplaatst. Daarbij wek je ook de indruk dat de "Netherlands Inst." een onderdeel is van het "Institute". Het lijkt me beter om Neth. Inst. in de categorie Archives in the Netherlands etc. te plaatsen. Eissink (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC).
Category:ESL_(e-sport)[edit]
|
ESL (e-sport) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Pbrks (talk) 20:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
BTW ...[edit]
Revision of 550629827; Kazakhstan is in Asia and Europe. Please have a look to the navigation bar. Please think again about whether it made sense to undo. --XRay 💬 16:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right! Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 15:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
MetaCat[edit]
May I ask what's the reason for putting MetaCat on the top? I have three reasons against: (1) it's visually worse, (2) it's less practical, (3) the vast majority of countries do not have it on top. --Orijentolog (talk) 14:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Better to put a warning at the top and it looks neater! Kind regards Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 15:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Seems like it's subjective in both cases (yours and mine). Anyway, my advice is to leave it as it is, in minor cases I found it on top and I was not changing. --Orijentolog (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- That is true, many people have different insights! And what is the best of that, because everyone thinks their idea is the best!? Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 22:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Haha, I don't. You're free to open new categories with your desired arrangement, but I disagree with changing existing ones due to the point (3), even it's argumentum en masse. Thousands of Iran-related MetaCat categories have countries on top and MetaCat template below, so I don't like exceptions. You can think that my idea is s***, but remember that billions of flies eat s*** and nobody is trying to stop them. Fair enough? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 02:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fortunately people don't stop the flies because they are not the problem but the s**** is the problem. People in the Netherlands know that all too well with a huge amount of livestock. That is why warnings at the top can help to do something about it together. Just like in traffic, signs can help you drive safely by placing them high so you can see them clearly. Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 11:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Country templates are thin so MetaCat warning signs are very visible. Speaking of aesthetics (i.e. first point above), I like to see templates in form of inverted pyramid, means countries as first, see also as second (both 100% wide), then MetaCat and templates like FOP-buildings-category warning (both 80% wide). Other solutions are IMHO messy and ugly. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- True, pyramid shapes are beautiful, but upside down I think they are ugly. That is why I think that many people do not apply it that way to Commons. Even uglier are two country templates with in between the MetaCat what some people do. It is better for everyone to have a fixed guideline. That's a lot neater for Commons instead of everyone doing it their own way! Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 14:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- True, pyramid shapes are beautiful, but upside down I think they are ugly. That is why I think that many people do not apply it that way to Commons. Even uglier are two country templates with in between the MetaCat what some people do. It is better for everyone to have a fixed guideline. That's a lot neater for Commons instead of everyone doing it their own way!
- Country templates are thin so MetaCat warning signs are very visible. Speaking of aesthetics (i.e. first point above), I like to see templates in form of inverted pyramid, means countries as first, see also as second (both 100% wide), then MetaCat and templates like FOP-buildings-category warning (both 80% wide). Other solutions are IMHO messy and ugly. --Orijentolog (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fortunately people don't stop the flies because they are not the problem but the s**** is the problem. People in the Netherlands know that all too well with a huge amount of livestock. That is why warnings at the top can help to do something about it together. Just like in traffic, signs can help you drive safely by placing them high so you can see them clearly.
- Haha, I don't. You're free to open new categories with your desired arrangement, but I disagree with changing existing ones due to the point (3), even it's argumentum en masse. Thousands of Iran-related MetaCat categories have countries on top and MetaCat template below, so I don't like exceptions. You can think that my idea is s***, but remember that billions of flies eat s*** and nobody is trying to stop them. Fair enough? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 02:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- That is true, many people have different insights! And what is the best of that, because everyone thinks their idea is the best!?
- Seems like it's subjective in both cases (yours and mine). Anyway, my advice is to leave it as it is, in minor cases I found it on top and I was not changing. --Orijentolog (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
Hi there. When you add {WI} to a cat, a bot changes it to {Wikidata Infobox}, and rather quickly; so that is no problem. I use it for practical reasons. OTOH, you should perhaps re-consider if it is nice to use exclamation marks anywhere, as people may take it as a sign of anger... Be well. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello E4024, I didn't know that a bot {WI} turns it into {Wikidata Infobox}. Nor did I know that there was already an article by Nilüfer Gündoğan. And the reason I used an exclamation mark was how you reacted. It came across as quite reproachful. Kind regards, Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 21:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- I do not know what reproachful means. The only thing I am trying to do in Commons is to be useful (to the project) and also teach what I know to others (be useful to colleagues), to help them. I wish I had met someone like me when I began here (or before, in WPs) to show me the things they knew. For example: While I say (today) to people that they have to add a {WI} to the new cats they open, at the same time I discover cats I opened without doing that, in my previous years, and correct them, just as I did in Category:Vakit a few minutes ago... E4024 (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- I too try to be useful, so we both try to contribute something. Yet it Thanks you wanted to help! Kind regards again, Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 21:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- I too try to be useful, so we both try to contribute something. Yet it Thanks you wanted to help! Kind regards again,
- I do not know what reproachful means. The only thing I am trying to do in Commons is to be useful (to the project) and also teach what I know to others (be useful to colleagues), to help them. I wish I had met someone like me when I began here (or before, in WPs) to show me the things they knew. For example: While I say (today) to people that they have to add a {WI} to the new cats they open, at the same time I discover cats I opened without doing that, in my previous years, and correct them, just as I did in Category:Vakit a few minutes ago... E4024 (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Category:Neighborhoods_of_Rotterdam[edit]
|
|
Category:Neighborhoods_of_Rotterdam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Jewish_Israeli_actors[edit]
|
|
Jewish Israeli actors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 01:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Jordi Cruijff[edit]
Hallo Antoine.01, Ik ben zeer verbaast dat jij de kategorie sortering van Cruijff op zijn voornaam hersteld hebt. Vind jij echt dat gebruikers hem zo makkelijker kunnen vinden? Of is er een andere reden? Dutchy45 (overleg) 12 aug 2021 16:48 (CEST)
- Ha Dutchy45, Zag je niet dat door de ingreep die je deed er een conflict was ontstaan. Dit kwam er schermbreed op het scherm te staan in het rood "Warning: Default sort key "Cruijff, Jordi" overrides earlier default sort key "Cruyff, Jordi"." Ik denk dat het beter is enkel de Wikidata Infobox te plaatsen en de DEFAULTSORT weg te laten die dan feitelijk niet nodig is! En als je de DEFAULTSORT samen met Wikidata Infobox plaatst dan dien je "|defaultsort=no" toe te voegen om een conflict te vermijden, niet als je enkel de Wikidata Infobox plaatst. Vr. gr. Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 15:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Category:Advisory_bodies[edit]
|
|
Category:Advisory_bodies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 15:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Fortweg (Utrecht) en Oud Wulven, Houten[edit]
Hoi Antoine.01, ik kwam Category:Fortweg (Utrecht) tegen bij het koppelen van categorieën over straten aan wikidata-items. Ik vroeg me af waarom deze categorie eigenlijk zo genoemd is en in Category:Streets in Utrecht (city) staat. Ik kan via topotijdreis.nl bijvoorbeeld niet vinden of deze weg (gedeeltelijk) in de stad/gemeente Utrecht heeft gelegen. Het noordelijk deel heeft zo te zien deelgemaakt van de Wayense dijk (thans gespeld Waijensedijk). De gemeentegrens van Utrecht komt er dichtbij, maar niets dat aan de weg zit, ligt daadwerkelijk in Utrecht. Is het dan logischer om de categorie te verplaatsen naar bijvoorbeeld Category:Fortweg (Houten) en de Utrechtse categorie weg te laten?
Verder weet ik niet precies wat het beste is te doen met een bovenliggende categorie, Category:Oud Wulven, Houten. Het gaat over het kasteel maar de subcategorieën en een paar afbeeldingen lijken meer gericht op het grondgebied van Oud-Wulven. Is het handig om dit op te splitsen in tweeën? Ik lees graag jouw gedachten hierover. Wikidatist (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ha Wikidatist, Ik heb (hier) ernaar gekeken en dacht dat er een gedeelte bij Utrecht hoorde. Maar bij nader inziens moet ik constateren dat de gehele weg bij Houten hoort en heb dit dan ook aangepast, bedankt voor het onder mijn aandacht te brengen!
- Wat betreft de "Category:Oud Wulven, Houten" gaat inderdaad over het grondgebied en alles wat zich hierop bevind en wat er ooit heeft gestaan zoals onder andere het kasteel waarvan een poort (een replica hiervan) nog zichtbaar is bij het gemeentehuis in Houten. Vr. gr. Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 22:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Prima, en bedankt voor het aanpassen. Bij Oud Wulven kon ik ook niet precies zien hoe het opgedeeld kon worden. Hoe het er nu staat lijkt mij helemaal goed. Wikidatist (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Category:Capsanthines[edit]
Are there more capsanthines than this one? Shouldn't the name of this category be Category:Capsanthine? Wostr (talk) 20:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- People want everything in the plural on commons, for me it is allowed in the singular. But usually someone else changes it in the plural I've already experienced that several times. Look at the other categories in the Category:Capsanthines that are also in the plural: Category:Food colorings - Category:Carotenoids - Category:Enones - Category:Diols - Category:Cyclic alcohols - Category:Cycloalkenes - Category:Pigments? Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 23:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- This is because other categories you mentioned are about classes of chemical compounds and not about specific chemical compounds. Category:Carotenoids is in plural, because it contains files about a class of compounds, Category:Apocarotenal, Category:Bixin, Category:Crocetin and Category:Norbixin are in singular, because these categories contain files about specific chemical compounds. I'll move Category:Capsanthines → Category:Capsanthine then. Wostr (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:Bill Conti[edit]
What is the connection here to Category:University of Washington? Nothing in the Wikipedia article... - Jmabel ! talk 03:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Must be the Louisiana State University and not University of Washington! Thank you for this, greeting Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 10:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)