User:ANGELUS/Valued

Valued images uploaded by Angelus

[[Image:|75x75px]]

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The [[:Image:|image]] you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alcide De Gasperi, portrait.

review

•  Comment It is better to make a connection to the scope of the category. If you want to make a link to an article done in the "reason".

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment - Ok, thank you for the suggestion. Angelus ^(talk) 14:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think a subscope is warranted here. พ.s. 22:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Question What does it means??? And please, next time, you don't have to change the scope removing the category that I entered! Angelus ^(talk) 23:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlo Gambino, portrait.

review

•  Comment Geocoding is needed. Yann (talk) 17:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Done --Angelus ^(talk) 17:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment The same with the profile, even with a lower resolution, is maybe more illustrative...--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

• The scope that I entered for this photo is "portrait", not "mugshot". ;-) --Angelus ^(talk) 20:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

• OK. ;)---Jebulon (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't think a subscope is warranted here. พ.s. 22:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Question What does it means??? And please, next time, you don't have to change the scope removing the category that I entered! Angelus ^(talk) 23:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battle of Lodi, painting.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support The nitpicker strikes again: at this time "Napoléon" was only "Bonaparte"...;)--Jebulon (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC) BTW, who took the picture ? we have a mention "own work"...--Jebulon (talk) 18:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • I took this picture a few years ago. ;-) Angelus ^(talk) 19:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Please create gallery and link to it in the scope. พ.s. 10:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
  •  Done - But please, next time, do not change the scope that I entered! Angelus ^(talk) 13:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edmond Leboeuf, photograph.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support He was not only General, but Marshall of France.--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Ok, I fixed the description page. ;-) Angelus ^(talk) 14:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
    • But you where not wrong: at the time of the picture, he was only general ! --Jebulon (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Major-General Robert Baden-Powell.

review

•  Comment Good topic. I think the scope name should be: Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell. It should be clear which of Baron Baden-Powell's is this: first, second or third ;) --MrPanyGoff 18:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• At the time, he was not Baron yet, he was just Major-General. He was appointed Baron in 1929. ;-) Angelus^(talk) 18:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• This is an often misunderstanding of the VI project. The scope is not a description of the image!!! The usual mistake here is that people find some good image and start calculating for some scope to fit the image. The encyclopedic knowledge theoretically already have all the scopes and just search for good images for them. Yes, I'm partly agree that there is something in the project that needs improvement. I think that, for now, we search for the best photo of Robert Stephenson Smyth Baden-Powell - so, this is actually the best scope name, imo ;) - no baron, no general, no titles but the full name. Is it ok? --MrPanyGoff 19:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• What are the full names of his sons and grandsons if any?--MrPanyGoff 19:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• Ok. But this is the best photo depicting Robert Baden-Powell as a Major-General, so this is the scope!

• P.S. I did not understand the meaning of the last question. Greetings. Angelus^(talk) 19:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment I would like to say my opinion again. We search for the best depiction of Robert Stephenson Smyth Baden-Powell and this is a good candidate for it. At least, you should remove South Africa from the scope.--MrPanyGoff 17:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
• Ok. ;-) --Angelus^(talk) 11:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Major-General Robert Baden-Powell, in South Africa to Major-General Robert Baden-Powell --Angelus^(talk) 11:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Well, I can accept it now.--MrPanyGoff 16:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 16:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klara Hitler.

review

•  Support Best (only) in scope, widely used on WMF projects. cmadler (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle).

review

•  Comment Is the scope the painting or the battle? For the former, this is the only image we have, so it could be VI if geocoded. For the battle, I am not sure a painting is the best illustration of the event. I would rather promote a map. Anyway, the scope needs to be fixed. Yann (talk) 17:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment - The scope is the painting. The geocoding is already inserted in the {{Institution}} template. Angelus^(talk) 18:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, then the scope should be the name of the painting. It seems to be The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle) [1]. The description should be updated. Yann (talk) 21:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Battle of Sinop, painting to The Sinopskiy Battle on the 18th November of the 1853 year (Night after Battle) --Angelus^(talk) 22:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Done - Greetings. --Angelus^(talk) 22:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 11:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

★ An image you uploaded has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you uploaded was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adolf Hitler as a child..

review

 Comment The scope must point to the categrory that contains the image not on an encyclopedia page. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

 Done :-) --Angelus^(talk) 12:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)