Template talk:PD-Philippines

Edit request

{{Edit request}} I'm fairly sure that the copyright term for the Philippines is 50pma, not 70pma, and 50pd anonymous, not 70 pd anonymous. See w:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights, w:List of countries' copyright length, Commons:Licensing#The Philippines, and w:Copyright law of the Philippines. Please change it back unless other evidence is provided. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

"Change it back"? Okay... I have searched a bit (why can't the people not use edit summaries?!): "the" change. I have requested Antemister to comment. Must have a reason why he changed --Saibo (Δ) 21:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

The reason I asked for the change is that it strikes me as a copy/paste mistake. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

It seems to be a C & P mistake, yes (not the first one)--Antemister (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay, what should be the text then? Just go back? Or just correct the numbers? Btw: note that "because the expressed work was either released into the public domain by the copyright holder" is lost in Antemister's version. So we may have files where a user from the philippines used that template to release (although probably not many). --Saibo (Δ) 23:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

As stated above, it should read 50 pma (50 pd anonymous), not 70 pma (70 pd anonymous). Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Allow me to hijack (wink wink) the discussion here a bit: there is a new version of the template available on Commons and I was hoping if we can replace the text of the current template with the new template. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 15:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Surplus line break

{{Edit request}} This template produces a surplus line break when transcluded, please remove the line break before the <noinclude> tag. --Patrick87 (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done -- Rillke^(q?) 20:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Non-copyrightability of architectural works prior to 1951

Per COM:FOP Philippines, should we include a statement that would say buildings finished prior to August 1, 1951 are not protected by copyright? -Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Howhontanozaz: there is one now, the new {{PD-Philippines-artistic work}}, which is loosely based on {{PD-US-architecture}}. So that this PD-Philippines template will only focus on objects not bound to FOP, like photos, literary pieces, book pages, maps, sound, videos, screenshots, etc.. FOP-bound objects, like buildings, sculptures, national monuments, and public murals, will use the new template from now on (and that template is universal for all artistic works). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)