Template talk:GFDL 1.2 or cc-by-nc-3.0

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Set correct CC category[edit]

{{Editprotected}} This template currently sets the CC category using Template:cc which is deprecated. Can we change it to using a non-deprecated template? Or if not, can we set a Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0 in it, so that images become correctly categorised? HYanWong (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just (re) created Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0, as per discussion at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0. Can we simply set a Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0 in this template now? HYanWong (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Had been done on Feb 12th. --Denniss (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation subpage[edit]

{{Edit request}} I have create the page Template:GFDL 1.2 or cc-by-nc-3.0/doc. Please remove in “noinclude” the documentation inclusive of the categories and replace this with {{Documentation}}. --Labant (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thank you for your contribution. —RP88 (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add SDC statement template[edit]

{{Edit request}} Please add the following:

{{SDC_statement_has_value
 |property             = P275
 |value                = Q26921686
 |missing_category     = GNU Free Documentation License missing SDC copyright license
 |mismatching_category = GNU Free Documentation License with different SDC copyright license
}}
{{SDC_statement_has_value
 |property             = P275
 |value                = Q18810331
 |missing_category     = Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 missing SDC copyright license
 |mismatching_category = Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 with different SDC copyright license
}}

I have created the latter two categories. --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 12:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Matr1x-101: Looking at other templates like {{GFDL-1.2}} and {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}, I expect this should be wrapped in something like {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|File|...}}? (Probably together with the existing Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0 link?) WDYT? Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lucas Werkmeister: I think we should
1. Remove the existing Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0
2. Add:
::<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|File|{{{category|[[Category:CC-BY-NC-3.0|{{PAGENAME}}]][[Category:GFDL-1.2|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}}
::{{SDC_statement_has_value
:: |property             = P275
:: |value                = Q26921686
:: |missing_category     = GNU Free Documentation License missing SDC copyright license
:: |mismatching_category = GNU Free Documentation License with different SDC copyright license
::}}
::{{SDC_statement_has_value
:: |property             = P275
:: |value                = Q18810331
:: |missing_category     = Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 missing SDC copyright license
:: |mismatching_category = Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 with different SDC copyright license
::}}
::}}</includeonly>
--Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, ✓ Done --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]