Talk:Aqueduct

Portuguese aqueducts

The Aqueduto das Águas Livres in Lisbon dates from the early 18th century and thus is not a Roman Aqueduct; IMHO this image should be removed from this page. — Nol Aders 23:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

done --Saperaud 23:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Redirect of Aqueduct

What is wrong with a redirect to Category:Aqueduct? There is no article/gallery in the mainnamespace that covers aqueducts fully yet - and Aqueduct (Roman) only covers Roman aqeuducts. --InfantGorilla 19:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

No-one answered me in a week. I am only trying to discuss this edit summary :"No cross-namespace redirects", but apparently it is not important enough to respond. So, I am reverting this redirect which is misleading to users. What does the user expect to see when they type Aqueduct and click the Go button? --InfantGorilla 13:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The disputed redirect was deleted for the move of Aqueduct (Roman) to Aqueduct. So, it is no longer an issue. --InfantGorilla 14:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Proposed move

Why not move this to Aqueduct, and include non-Roman aqueducts? --InfantGorilla 13:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok. Gallery moved to Aqueduct today, and double redirects fixed. --InfantGorilla 14:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)