File:NCL-09408 謝宣城詩集.pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,558 × 1,239 pixels, file size: 11.65 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 91 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
謝宣城詩集   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
謝朓
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
謝宣城詩集
Edition 宋嘉定十三年(1220)洪汲宣州郡齋重刊本配補影宋鈔本
Description

卷數:五卷

裝訂:線裝

數量:2冊

共同創作者姓名:劉詩孫

索書號:402.391 09408

序跋者:樓炤 洪伋

收藏印記:「國立中央圖/書館收藏」朱文長方印、「陳印/彥良」白文方印、「寶應劉氏食舊德齋/藏書之記」朱文方印、「寶應劉/啟瑞祕/笈之記」白文方印、「詩/孫」朱文方印、「食舊/德齋」朱文方印、「食舊/德齋」白文長方印

版本行款:10行

高廣:(匡20.9 x 15.8公分)

題跋釋文:謝宣城詩集五卷二冊 南齊謝朓撰 宋嘉定十三年洪伋宣州郡齋重刊本配補影宋鈔本 近人劉啟瑞手書題記、劉文興過錄傅增湘題記並手跋 (09408) 此先君在京收得宋刻謝宣城詩集殘本,每頁二十行,行十八字,原五卷,今存二卷,目錄九頁,缺第二頁,可據存卷鈔補。卷端有陳彥良印,不知誰何。前後用藏經紙裝,前已失,有墨景微可識別,後一紙存其上半,意尚是元明人裝襯,今茲重裝,仍存其舊。此書四庫總目入別集,所據為內府藏本,前有樓炤序,紹興二十八年所刻,稱為南宋佳本。此書構、敦皆缺筆,似刻稍後,而為宋刻則毫無疑義,況其為元明裝定耶!子孫其世寶之。劉啟瑞。本朝吳氏有仿宋版,猶可覓得,影鈔配全。 〔過錄〕謝宣城詩集宋刊殘本,存卷一、卷二。半葉十行,每行十八字,白口,左右雙闌,版心上記字數,下記刊工姓名,上魚尾下記謝集一、二。前有目錄,缺第二葉,第二行低三格題齊尚書吏部郎陳郡謝眺元暉(謝下空一格)。卷一賦九首、雩祭歌八首、四言詩二十八首,卷二鼓吹曲四十三首,卷三詩四十三首,卷四詩四十六首,卷五詩四十首、聯句七首。本書第一行題謝宣城詩集卷第一,次行低三格題賦一字,三行低四格題酬德賦。宋諱玄、弘、筐、貞、搆、敦、廓、巘皆缺末筆。刊工有侯琦,潘德璋、潘暉諸人名。收藏有陳彥良印白文印。字體方整,而氣息渾厚,與浙杭本迥別,知為宣州郡齋所刊。此雖佚去下冊,後跋不可得見,然以宋諱至廓字證之,則為嘉定十三年洪伋翻雕樓炤本無疑也(伋跋言樓公鋟本距今六十四年,字畫漫毀,幾不可讀,用再刻於郡齋云)。案宣城集,據書錄解題云,集本十卷,樓炤知宣州,只以上五卷賦與詩刊之,下五卷皆當時應用之文,衰世之事可采者,已見本傳及文選,餘視詩劣焉,無傳焉可也,遂置之。其言皆本炤序,然自是元暉之集祇以五卷傳矣。天祿琳琅載有宋刊本,即嘉定洪伋所刻,余領秘閣時,檢昭仁殿冊籍,已無此書,蓋不知流落何許。生平所知見者有汲古閣影宋本,明人依宋鈔本、何義門校宋本、正德劉紹本、嘉靖黎晨、薛應旂本、萬曆史元熙本、汪士賢本、天啟張燮本、康熙郭威釗本。大抵宋本而下,皆為五卷,至張燮增補為六卷,而郭威釗繼之,自詡有搜采遺佚之功,而不知已蹈擅改古本之失。嘉慶初元,吳騫拜經樓依宋本重刊,舉世咸推為精善,第余今日取宋本參證之,則可議者亦正多。茲將各本臚舉於後,略考其源流得失之故,可一展卷而瞭如指掌,後有研誦小謝之詩者,庶得所取資乎。 內府宋刊本:天祿琳琅卷三載之,舊為季滄葦所藏,見於延令書目。有樓炤序,序後有洪伋跋,未詳著行款若何,第以影〔汲〕古閣影本推之,知其決為十行十八字,與此殘冊正同。 汲古影宋本:今藏德化李椒微師家,癸丑正月曾得假閱,就校於拜經樓本。十行十八字,目錄序跋皆完具,格武與宋刊無異,紙墨精雅,神采煥發,所謂下真蹟一等者。然余以宋本對勘,則訛舛時復錯出,就卷首言之,如酬德賦中「曾陰默以悽惻」,誤作「棲惻」;「實興齊之二六」,誤作「與齊」;「齊天地於倐忽」,誤作「條忽」。高松賦中「既芊眠於廣隰」,誤作「竿眠」。三日侍曲水詩「實符時」作「寶符」。此咸顯然可見者,或原本漫漶,不可辨析,而鈔胥又未經詳審,致有此失也。 明影宋本:今藏上海涵芬樓,舊為毛子晉、季滄葦、徐健庵遞藏,曾影印入四部叢刊行世。取宋本一核,其次第皆循舊武,而行款已改為十行二十字,目錄次行刪去元暉結銜一行,而雩祭歌前加樂府標題一行(雩祭歌上又妄加齊字)。至篇中文字,差失殊多,如酬德賦「眷予以國士」,誤作「國子」;「相羣方之動植」,「方」誤作「芳」;「援雅範以自綏」,「綏」誤作「緩」;「君紆組於名邦」,「紓﹝紆﹞」誤作「紓」;「奉京枌而作傳」,「枌」誤作「粉」;「意搔之以杼柚」,「柚」誤作「袖」;「齊懽賞之多違」,「齊」誤作「各」。考毛、季兩家,皆藏有宋本,而此影鈔乃率略如是,不可解也。至永明樂第四、七、八首咸有空格,意原本剝蝕,不敢臆補,以存其真耳。 何義門校宋本:此為乾隆丙辰半查氏(失其姓)錄義門手校宋本,為盛意園舊藏,余於廠肆得覯,臨於吳本上。其所舉宋本作某者,與今宋本多不相應,如卷二淥水曲「桂棹及晚風」,何校宋作「晚春」,今宋本乃作「春風」也。永明樂第九首「生蔑芊羅性」,何校宋作『千羅』,今宋本仍是『芊』字。豈所見非一刻,或後來補版耶? 武功本:正德辛未劉紹刊於武功縣,康海為之序,原本世不多見,余生平亦未之覯,據黎晨跋言,用武功本新之,則其行款當與黎本同。 甯國本:嘉靖丁酉任丘黎晨刊,十一行,二十二字。卷一首有直隸甯國府知府黎晨校刊一行,後有晨跋,言取武功本新之,而宣庠所呈鈔本校焉。次第大段與宋本不異,惟目錄前元暉結銜亦刪落不存,每題下一首等字皆刊去。雩祭歌,如迎神、送神曲、五帝等歌,宋本標於歌曲後,今改在前。其最為紕繆者,如卷二同諸公賦吹鼓〔鼓吹〕曲名,刪去『先後為次』四字,及『同前再賦』四字,於是次第紊雜,而王融巫山高一首誤屬之范雲矣。卷五之同詠樂器三首、同詠坐上器玩二首,同詠坐上所見物,亦改易次序,刪去人名,於是王融、沈約、虞炎、柳惲諸人之詩皆誤為元暉之作,後之閱者,益難以釐正矣,溯其原始,皆由武功本作之俑,黎氏因襲而莫能糾之。至篇中文字繆失,亦多自黎而始,如酬德賦首句云『悲夫四游之代序,六龍騖而不息』,黎本『悲夫』作『嗟夫』,『游』上衍一『時』字,『騖』誤作『鶩』,嗣是諸本皆從之,而沿訛踵繆,不可爬梳,不知所云,依鈔本校正者,果何為耶? 六朝詩集本:嘉靖癸卯薛應旂刊六朝詩集二十二家,宣城集仍為五卷,前無序目,十行,十八字,與宋本合,次第亦相同,然卷二之同諸公賦鼓吹曲、卷五之詠樂器玩物,其溷亂與黎本同,其酬德賦首二句誤四字亦同,疑即取黎刻為藍本耳。 宣城本:萬曆己卯史元熙刻,梅鼎祚校,八行,十八字,版心有『覽翠亭』三字。據史序云,黎君版置郡齋,就武功本也,後四十餘年久漫漶不可讀,乃斥奉刻之,里中梅禹金有事校讐,得樓序,并佚者數篇,則復首載史乘焉。今考集前有南齊書南史列傳、郡志列傳、樓炤序,皆梅氏所增輯也。余所藏為殘本,僅存前二卷,然其篇第已大有更易,卷一只載賦九首,其雩祭歌、侍宴四言詩,皆析出,歸入卷二,雜置之隋王鼓吹雜曲中,輕改舊次,殊為繆妄,蓋數百年相傳之次序,其離析紊雜,實由茲始,所謂傳播之功,不敵其擅改之過也。 漢魏二十一家集本:萬曆汪士賢刻,九行,二十字,次第大率與黎本同,其卷二卷五詩題人名差誤亦同,當從黎刻出,卷第五末又增逸詩及文三首耳,然考其所補逸詩四首,如范雲之離夜詩已見卷四,王融之琵琶、沈約之篪二詩已見卷五,前後祇距數番,乃森然複出,竟熟視而無睹,抑又何說耶? 七十二家集本︰天啟末,張燮刻於閩漳,九行,十八字,增訂為六卷,凡賦一卷、詩四卷、文一卷。此本不獨增文十九首,更將詩之前後次第悉予變更,無知妄作,莫甚於此。 清宣城本:康熙丁亥郭威釗刻於宣城,梅庚校訂。其析卷一之雩祭歌、四言詩入卷二,實仍其家禹金之舊跡。補逸詩三首,其范雲一首已見卷四,補文十九首,為卷第六,則取諸張燮本也。 總以上各本觀之,自明以來凡七刻,其始也,祇文字之沿誤而已,久之而標題刊奪矣,久之而次序雜溷矣,浸假而移易卷第,錯亂篇次,至不可勝糾矣。大抵展轉傳寫,久遠失真者,其弊小;其妄逞胸臆,改併增損,貿然以訂輯自任者,其弊大。吳兔床氏深悼劉黎諸本之失,一旦訪得宋本,而盡正之,其致力至勤,而為功至偉,顧余展此殘帙,句比而字勘之,頗惜其讐校未精,殊不足以副己言而饜人望也。茲就首卷舉之,目錄前刪去眺官銜一行,而於雩祭歌前增樂歌標題一行,又題下幾首字亦悉予刊落;卷一首不著賦字標題一行,此皆沿鈔本之失,宋本固不如是也。至字句之誤失,如酬德賦『得其盡體物之旨』,脫『其』字;『貽話言於川渚』,『川』誤『洲』;思歸賦『睠重芒而引領』,『芒』誤『岡』;七夕賦『綿含睇而娥揚』,『娥』誤『蛾』;高松賦『邈道勝於千祀』,『祀』誤『禩』;黑帝歌『曾冰冽積羽幽』,『冽』誤『裂』;侍宴光華殿詩『營絳分區』,『絳』誤『降』;侍宴曲水詩『誰器元功』,『器』誤『契』。其他類此正多,未易枚舉。余維兔床以校勘名家,豈宜疏失至此,及詳玩其跋語,則彼第取盧紹弓傳校之本以鋟木,實未嘗親見宋刻也。紹弓校書,專重本文,以朱書細字注於行間,而其餘版式行格例不詳記,余家所儲抱經樓手勘羣籍大率如此。今兔床未睹原書,第就傳本移寫,又拘於叢書之版式而為之,故行款既非古武,又剌取考訂異文綴於本句下(審其文字,似出抱經隨手劄記)以云翻宋,實為非體,其他提行、空格、標題、夾注,一切皆失舊觀。書經三寫,焉烏帝虎,自所難免,況又移改格式,以滋其誤耶?抑余更有疑者,兔床跋稱蕘圃藏有宣城集兩宋本,考之百宋一廛賦、求古居宋本書目、士禮居題跋,咸未登錄,六朝古集絕少宋刊,得一已難,何況兼致,設果有之,則當摩挲賞玩,偏語知交,何至寂寂無聞不傳一字耶?吾意澗薲所言蕘圃所寄,或為影寫及傳校之屬,不應於三謝之外更有宣城耳。 此殘本二卷,為同年世好劉君翰臣所藏,言其尊人茀卿先生官京曹時所得,余辛酉游淮南時,曾得賞翫,頃翰臣丈重游燕都,携此帙見示,屬代覓良工,假椒微師藏毛鈔本影寫後三卷,俾成完璧,因留置齋頭?前日偶取郭氏本細校一過,卷一賦九首訂正八十字,雩祭歌訂正四十八字,四言詩訂正四十字,卷二五言詩訂正一百八十五字,通計訂正凡三百三十三字,若天壤尚存完帙,則單詞勝義,耐人尋繹者,當復不少,姑懸此奢願,或庶幾一遇乎?余生平於小謝似有夙緣,壬子四月始臨何義門校宋本,癸丑二月復校汲古閣影宋本,嗣睹涵芬樓明寫本,更詳勘一過,今又幸得親見宋本,自謂致功之密,搜訪之勤,視兔床未遑多讓,而篋中所儲,自黎晨以下各本咸具,今情古思,左右紛投,儻得屏去俗囂,董理諸編,廓盡榛蕪,垂為定本,更取宋版殘卷、毛鈔秘笈合寫付雕,重新嘉定之規摹,庶彌拜經之遺憾,世有劉孝綽、梁武帝其人者,或將引為同好,樂觀厥成也歟?辛未四月十八日,藏園居士記。 辛未初夏傅沅叔老人既為此跋,越六年,始借李木齋太年丈藏毛鈔謝集,影寫後三卷為全璧。迨書鈔竣而外患起,顛沛流離,并傅氏原書題跋亦復失去。茲據藏園羣書題記第二集錄跋如上,并識其緣起於此。丙戌冬日,劉文興奉家君命謹識。

附註項:朱筆點校

複製本
Publication date 宋嘉定13年
Place of publication 洪汲
Source
institution QS:P195,Q618340
https://rbook.ncl.edu.tw/NCLSearch

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).


This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current02:39, 25 September 2023Thumbnail for version as of 02:39, 25 September 20231,558 × 1,239, 91 pages (11.65 MB)Bot for Freedom (talk | contribs)上載《13312_1.pdf》

The following page uses this file:

Metadata