File:LAPD Cops Shoot And Tase Man Armed With a Butcher Knife.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 6 min 37 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 929 kbps overall, file size: 44.03 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Los Angeles, California — On July 20, officers in the Hollenbeck Division responded to a radio call about a man with a knife, and found a man armed with a butcher knife. The man “stood up from a living room couch and charged at” the officers, who moved to another location. The man then charged at them again, and one officer shot the man in the hip while a second officer deployed a Taser. The man, later identified as Edward Joseph Rubio, 52, was taken to the hospital in stable condition. He was expected to survive. The shooting remains under investigation.

Timestamps: 0:00 - 911 Call 2:21 - Bodycam: Officer #1

5:29 - Bodycam: Officer #2
Date
Source YouTube: LAPD Cops Shoot And Tase Man Armed With a Butcher Knife – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author LAPD

Licensing[edit]

Public domain This file is a work of a Los Angeles Police Department officer or employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of a Californian government agency (either state or local) that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, the file is in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so.
Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to the image unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

Public domain

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:50, 19 May 20236 min 37 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (44.03 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLGk2X0fcqg

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 998 kbps Completed 00:19, 20 May 2023 2 h 13 min 30 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 905 kbps Completed 22:53, 14 March 2024 3.0 s
VP9 720P 609 kbps Completed 23:29, 19 May 2023 1 h 37 min 17 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 480P 394 kbps Completed 01:40, 20 May 2023 5 min 34 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 360P 278 kbps Completed 01:53, 20 May 2023 20 min 59 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 240P 211 kbps Completed 01:40, 20 May 2023 8 min 9 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 119 kbps Completed 07:10, 13 January 2024 3.0 s
WebM 360P 503 kbps Completed 01:35, 20 May 2023 2 min 48 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1 Mbps Completed 18:36, 8 November 2023 24 s
Stereo (Opus) 92 kbps Completed 18:17, 8 November 2023 8.0 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 18:18, 8 November 2023 13 s

Metadata