File:Holm Gero Hummler - ESC2017.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP8/Vorbis, length 30 min 30 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 754 kbps overall, file size: 164.41 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Relative Quantum Nonsense: Don't be Fooled by False Physics!"

Holm Gero Hummler European Skeptics Congress 2017

Dr. Holm Gero Hümmler studied physics at the Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. During his diploma thesis in nuclear physics, he spent several months at CERN in Geneva. He did his Ph.D. at the Munich Technical University, working at the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich – ironically at a time when one the institute’s directors was the famous proponent of quantum mysticism Hans-Peter Dürr. The actual experiment (STAR) was located at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Long Island, New York, where Holm Hümmler spent several months setting up the detector and developing analysis software. He left science in 2001, working first for The Boston Consulting Group, then for a smaller German consultancy before starting his own management consulting business, Uncertainty Managers Consulting, in 2007. He specializes in numerical models for future business planning across various industries, but with some focus on the pharmaceuticals and healthcare sector. He lives and works in Bad Homburg, on the outskirts of Frankfurt. Holm Hümmler has been active in the German skeptics’ movement and the GWUP organization since the late 1990s. Since the formation of a regional GWUP chapter in the Frankfurt area, he has taken on the role of regional spokesman and convenor. After some years in the board of editors of the Skeptiker magazine, he has shifted his attention to investigating some of the more unusual technical claims skeptics encounter in Germany, mostly from the areas of pseudo-physics, business esoterics, modern conspiracy theories and supernatural claims from the world of martial arts. Since then, he has been invited to talk at the German SkepKon conferences almost annually, regularly speaks at GWUP’s different local chapters and occasionally participates in science slams. Through GWUP, he is available as an expert for the media, mostly on conspiracy theories like chemtrails. In 2008, he investigated the abilities of Shaolin monks on the Galileo Mystery TV show. Holm Hümmler’s first skeptical book, Relativer Quantenquark, appeared in April 2017. It deals with pseudo-physical claims in esoterics and alternative medicine, explaining the basics of relativity and quantum mechanics along the way. In parallel, he started writing the blog quantenquark.com to address more current developments that did not find room in the book.

"Relative Quantum Nonsense: Don't be Fooled by False Physics!" Quantum healing is considered a form of spiritual healing, but quantum healers claim to actually practice physics. Deepak Chopra explains quantum healing as a nonlocal physical effect on the “quantum mechanical body”. Alternative healers turned management consultants offer business advice based on information from a quantum physical zero-point field. In Germany’s well-reputed newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine, the national football team’s coach is seriously called upon to create a quantum physical entanglement between his players. Tachyons are hypothetical particles moving faster than the speed of light. According to experimental knowledge they don’t exist, but massages with tachyons are commonly offered, especially in Belgium and the Netherlands. From quantum homeopathy via quantum acupuncture to quantum astrology, there is hardly an esoterical business not offered in the form of pseudo-physics. Modern physics has become a common explanation for alternative practitioners, happily mixed with Huna teachings, chakras and TCM meridians. Using Einstein, Heisenberg or Bohr to justify one’s claims deters potential critics, and well-founded criticism from actual physicists is rare. Often, quacks, conspiracy theorists and woo-peddlers can even quote famous scientists or press releases from renowned institutes, which sound stunningly similar to their own claims. As a result, many non-scientists are under the impression that modern physics can be used as a justification for a seemingly limitless array of supernatural claims. Others may have a strange feeling that something about Deepak Chopra’s claims just cannot be right, but they lack the physics background to actually know that or even refute such claims in a public discussion.

There are, however, some simple red flags to indicate quantum nonsense in an argument and ways to expose them. There are also simple questions to ask which can indicate whether the theory of relativity or quantum mechanics can have any kind of relevance for a situation – in other words, whether they actually yield different results than ordinary, classical physics
Date
Source YouTube: Holm Gero Hummler - ESC 2017 – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author ESC European Skeptics Congress

Licensing[edit]

This video, screenshot or audio excerpt was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license.
Their website states: "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license."
To the uploader: You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available.
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Attribution: ESC European Skeptics Congress
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This file, which was originally posted to YouTube: Holm Gero Hummler - ESC 2017 – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today, was reviewed on 5 December 2017 by reviewer Explicit, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current02:02, 17 November 201730 min 30 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (164.41 MB)Nederlandse Leeuw (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSHsrID2oHc

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 671 kbps Completed 22:32, 28 August 2018 1 h 0 min 41 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 583 kbps Completed 18:47, 7 February 2024 9.0 s
VP9 720P 351 kbps Completed 22:08, 28 August 2018 36 min 23 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 480P 205 kbps Completed 21:56, 28 August 2018 24 min 40 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) 118 kbps Completed 02:50, 18 March 2024 3.0 s
VP9 360P 144 kbps Completed 21:49, 28 August 2018 18 min 10 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 240P 116 kbps Completed 21:45, 28 August 2018 14 min 36 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 29 kbps Completed 03:17, 2 January 2024 2.0 s
WebM 360P 334 kbps Completed 02:16, 17 November 2017 13 min 40 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 834 kbps Completed 19:33, 14 November 2023 1 min 17 s
Stereo (Opus) 83 kbps Completed 00:01, 24 November 2023 26 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 16:05, 9 November 2023 37 s

File usage on other wikis

The following other wikis use this file:

Metadata