File:FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection (IA annalysisofusnav1094510110).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 772 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 180 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

An analysis of the U.S. Navy verification, validation, and accreditation (VVandA) process for modeling and simulation (MandS) used for operational test (OT) of surface ships and weapons   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Griffith, Anthony A.
Locke, W. Michael.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
An analysis of the U.S. Navy verification, validation, and accreditation (VVandA) process for modeling and simulation (MandS) used for operational test (OT) of surface ships and weapons
Publisher
Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

In this climate of declining budgets and resources, models and simulations (MandS) have become very beneficial to the U.S. Navy. However, the U.S. Navy's investment in, and use of, MandS for addressing critical operational issues (COIs) within a warship's operational test (OT) program would not be practical unless the particular MandS was determined to be a credible representation of that which would be physically tested. Commander Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COMOPTEVFOR) is responsible for accrediting U.S. Navy MandS that are required to support OT. COMOPTEVFOR has developed a VVandA process that is documented in COMOPTEVFORINST 5000.1A. This instruction requires all surface ship acquisition program managers (PMs) to develop a Validation and Verification (VandV) plan that would meet COMOPTEVFOR's expectations for likely accreditation. This thesis will identify the extent to which surface ship PMs are complying with COMOPTEVFORINST 5000.1A; why they are not in full compliance with the instruction; what incentives would help them comply with the instruction; and what improvements can be made to the instruction that would increase compliance by the PMs. Finally, this thesis will conclude with recommendations that would help increase compliance with the instruction by the PMs.


Subjects: Weapons.; Modeling and simulation; verification; validation; and accreditation; navy; operational test; surface ship; acquisition; program manager;
Language English
Publication date June 2006
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
annalysisofusnav1094510110
Source
Internet Archive identifier: annalysisofusnav1094510110
https://archive.org/download/annalysisofusnav1094510110/annalysisofusnav1094510110.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
\"Approved for public release, distribution unlimited\"--Cover.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current13:50, 14 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 13:50, 14 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 180 pages (772 KB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection annalysisofusnav1094510110 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #7543)

Metadata