File:FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection (IA acomparisonofcur1094524346).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.85 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 64 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparison of current Naval Facilities Engineering Command field office staffing methods, state staffing methods and the construction industry institutes owner contractor work structure   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Monreal, Michael
Title
A comparison of current Naval Facilities Engineering Command field office staffing methods, state staffing methods and the construction industry institutes owner contractor work structure
Description

This report was generated by accepting a report topic contained in a list of topics on the Civil Engineer Corps Graduate School Information web page. The topic request and description is noted as follows: Topic. How to Measure Staffing Requirements in ROICC offices and Other Acquisition Functions with a description. Description: We base current staffing requirements on history and only adjust from what we have used in the past years. It is suspected that there is a difference between East Coast and West Coast but do not have numbers to back it up. A long time ago there was a chart used for Resident Officer in Charge of Construction (ROICC) positions showing both dolls in Work in Place (WIP) and number of projects handled showing the number of engineers, con reps, clerks, etc. but is has not been used for about 15 to 20 years. Maybe there should be a current chart or some other consistent means of measuring staffing needs that accounts for type of work size of projects, as well as Design in Place (DIP) and WIP. Research what private industry uses. Look for some method that can be used by all.


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date 2001
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparisonofcur1094524346
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparisonofcur1094524346
https://archive.org/download/acomparisonofcur1094524346/history/files/acomparisonofcur1094524346.pdf.%7E260%7E
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:36, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:36, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 64 pages (2.85 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonofcur1094524346 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5216)

Metadata