File:Economic analysis of a basic allowance for health care for active duty and retired members of the armed forces (IA economicnalysiso1094544677).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.16 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 102 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Economic analysis of a basic allowance for health care for active duty and retired members of the armed forces   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Stratman, Scott A.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Economic analysis of a basic allowance for health care for active duty and retired members of the armed forces
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

In 2014, CBO reported health care expenditures consumed nearly 10 percent of the overall defense budget in 2012, up from 4 percent in 1990. Jansen, of the Congressional Research Service, noted in 2014 that moral hazard is considered one of the drivers of these increased costs; moral hazard results from lower out-of-pocket expenses. Adjustments to the administration of health benefits within DOD may reduce the DHP budget. Implementation of a basic allowance for health care (BAHC) for active duty dependents and retirees to use with a high deductible health plan (HDHP) and health savings account may provide incentives to use more cost-effective levels of care. The price elasticity of demand for health care is used to determine potential savings as the result of increased costs associated with the HDHP. The implementation of a BAHC is also examined from the point of view of the beneficiary to evaluate how they might respond to the changing incentives. This research found that while the plans are likely to invoke behavioral responses among beneficiaries and reduce moral hazard, unless they are widely adopted throughout the DOD they are unlikely to generate substantial cost savings as a percentage of current levels of spending.


Subjects: tricare; high deductible health plan; health savings account; basic allowance for health care; benefits
Language English
Publication date December 2014
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
economicnalysiso1094544677
Source
Internet Archive identifier: economicnalysiso1094544677
https://archive.org/download/economicnalysiso1094544677/economicnalysiso1094544677.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current10:31, 18 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 10:31, 18 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 102 pages (2.16 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection economicnalysiso1094544677 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #14612)

Metadata