File:Dashcam- Police Officer Suggests Using a Bat On Escaped Suspect.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 6 min 39 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.76 Mbps overall, file size: 83.74 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English: A Sacramento police officer faced a disciplinary review for calling suspect Dazion Jerome Flenaugh a “freak” and suggesting that a bystander should hit him with a baseball bat in a verbal exchange captured on dashcam video about 16 minutes before other officers shot Flenaugh dead. Police spokesman Bryce Heinlein said an “administrative review” was conducted with the unidentified officer, whom he described as a “seasoned” veteran with more than 10 years of experience. Heinlein declined to give the outcome of that review, citing privacy rules. Under California law, law enforcement personnel matters are confidential.

The remarks occurred during an April 8 incident in which police shot and killed Flenaugh, 40, a mentally ill homeless man in south Sacramento. The unidentified officer was the first one to interact with Flenaugh, placing him in the back of a police cruiser after approaching him based on a 911 call reporting a man wandering the Parkway neighborhood of south Sacramento looking in windows. Flenaugh was not arrested, but grew severely agitated and began hitting the door and climbing on the seats searching for escape.

The unidentified officer can be heard speaking on two videos released by the Sacramento Police Department. “What are you doing, you freak?” the officer said in one video from a dashboard camera as he opened the door to check on Flenaugh. Flenaugh then pushed past the officer and ran from the vehicle. The unidentified officer and a second officer who responded to the scene did not at first vigorously pursue Flenaugh, based on video released to The Sacramento Bee on Tuesday. Told by a bystander that Flenaugh had entered a backyard, the unidentified officer climbed onto the hood of his police cruiser to see if he could spot Flenaugh.

Seconds later, a bystander asked what was happening, and the unidentified officer told him, “Oh there’s some nut, tweak, just freaking out. He’s back there somewhere. Well, if you see him, just hit him with a baseball bat a couple of times. That’ll mellow him out.” The two officers then walked back to their cars, one laughing. Of the remarks, Heinlein said, “It falls under conduct unbecoming of an officer. It’s not something that we condone. It’s a comment that makes the department and that officer look poor in the eyes of the community and peers.” Flenaugh continued to run from police and grew increasingly violent. At one point, he used a pickax he found in a backyard to break the sliding-glass door of another house. Inside that house, he armed himself with a meat cleaver and a kitchen knife. Police on Wednesday released photos of those weapons. An officer wearing a body camera was heard at the scene describing them.

Police said that when officers located Flenaugh on Center Parkway near Lerner Way, he lunged at police holding both knives. Three officers shot Flenaugh dead, firing 16 shots and hitting him seven times. Officers confirmed Flenaugh was dead before medical personnel arrived, based on body camera footage. No toxicology report has been released, but Heinlein said Flenaugh had amphetamine and methamphetamine in his system. Heinlein said the department does not have mandated disciplinary guidelines, but evaluates each incident independently. “It’s a case-by-case basis,” Heinlein said. “It depends on the severity of the offense, too.”

The video and audio recordings were released by the city after a Public Records Act request filed by The Bee. The City Council in late November approved Police Department changes that included releasing video of fatal officer-involved incidents in most instances. While the Flenaugh incident occurred before the new rule was passed, city officials said they chose to release the materials as part of a push for government transparency at City Hall. An investigation of the incident is ongoing with the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office, but all officers involved in the Flenaugh case have returned to active duty, Heinlein said. The city also hired an independent investigator to exam
Date
Source YouTube: Dashcam: Police Officer Suggests Using a Bat On Escaped Suspect – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author SPD

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work was created by a government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies) that derives its powers from the laws of the State of California and is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.). It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so. This applies even if there is a copyright notice, so long as the State of California or one of its agencies (other than those listed above) is indicated as the copyright holder.

Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to these images unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Copyrightable Works by the State in the United States: Works published by agencies that are permitted to claim copyright per state law should be tagged with {{PD-US-GovEdict}} instead of this template due to the reasons listed on that template.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current18:06, 20 May 20236 min 39 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (83.74 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVkZ2qLPB70

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 1.74 Mbps Completed 18:30, 20 May 2023 24 min 22 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 1.67 Mbps Completed 01:56, 6 February 2024 6.0 s
VP9 720P 1.08 Mbps Completed 18:16, 20 May 2023 9 min 40 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) 1 Mbps Completed 15:58, 12 March 2024 4.0 s
VP9 480P 666 kbps Completed 22:46, 20 May 2023 6 min 7 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) 590 kbps Completed 02:44, 31 January 2024 4.0 s
VP9 360P 426 kbps Completed 22:53, 20 May 2023 15 min 4 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) 349 kbps Completed 05:29, 6 February 2024 2.0 s
VP9 240P 282 kbps Completed 22:40, 20 May 2023 3 min 12 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 205 kbps Completed 08:47, 16 December 2023 1.0 s
WebM 360P 576 kbps Completed 22:45, 20 May 2023 6 min 17 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 982 kbps Completed 22:56, 2 November 2023 22 s
Stereo (Opus) 76 kbps Completed 08:49, 21 November 2023 7.0 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 12:23, 1 November 2023 11 s

Metadata