File:DESIGN STRATEGIES AND TACTICS TO DEFEAT CO-ORBITAL ANTI-SATELLITE CAPABILITIES (IA designstrategies1094559677).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 8.05 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 104 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

DESIGN STRATEGIES AND TACTICS TO DEFEAT CO-ORBITAL ANTI-SATELLITE CAPABILITIES   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Hanlon, Edward A.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
DESIGN STRATEGIES AND TACTICS TO DEFEAT CO-ORBITAL ANTI-SATELLITE CAPABILITIES
Publisher
Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School
Description

Spacecraft play an increasingly significant role in U.S. military operations. For adversaries looking to degrade U.S. capability to mitigate tactical advantage, this reliance provides another attack vector and represents a potential U.S. weakness. Recent technological developments have resulted in the increased proliferation of “attack” satellites. A strong understanding of the orbital domain and orbital dynamics is necessary to effectively evade these attackers. Much like the early days of aviation, space innovation has outpaced existing tactics, techniques and procedures. This thesis aims to provide an overview of the domain and possible evasive maneuvers to facilitate further tactics development. It begins with an overview of the threat landscape to provide background on what to expect and proceeds to discuss what positions of advantage are in space and how thrust commands translate to maneuvers at different time scales. It details the development of an engagement simulator and provides insight as to the effect of various evasion thrust patterns. From this, an evasion tactic is developed and tested in the simulator. This tactic proves effective in evading an aggressor while also demonstrating substantial fuel savings over alternative methods. Finally, different spacecraft parameters are compared to determine what hardware improvements provide the best evasive capability.


Subjects: satellite; evasion; survivability; anti-satellite; defense; co-orbital; space; maneuver
Language English
Publication date June 2018
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
designstrategies1094559677
Source
Internet Archive identifier: designstrategies1094559677
https://archive.org/download/designstrategies1094559677/designstrategies1094559677.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current16:50, 16 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 16:50, 16 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 104 pages (8.05 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection designstrategies1094559677 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #13515)

Metadata