File:Carolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015).webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP8/Vorbis, length 21 min 44 s, 1,280 × 720 pixels, 778 kbps overall, file size: 120.9 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Over 90 per cent of the world’s states currently select their national leaders through multiparty elections. However, in Africa the quality of elections still varies widely, ranging from elections plagued by violence and fraud to elections that are relatively ‘free and fair’. Yet, little is known about trade-offs between different strategies of electoral manipulation and the differences between incumbent and opposition actors’ strategies. We theorize that choices for specific types of manipulation are driven by available resources and cost considerations for both incumbents and opposition actors, and are mutually responsive. We also suggest that costs of manipulative strategies are shaped by the level of democratization. We test our hypotheses on time-series, cross-sectional dataset with observations for 286 African elections from 1986 to 2012. We find that democratization makes ‘cheap’ forms of electoral manipulation available to incumbents such as intimidation and manipulating electoral administration less viable, thus leading to increases in vote buying. The future of democracy in Africa thus promises elections where the administration of elections becomes better and better but at the same time vote buying will increase. Not all things go together, at least not all the time. The future of democracy in Africa will mean more money in politics, more patronage and more clientelistic offers thrown around, at least in the short to medium term.

Discussant: Dr. Ferran Martinez i Coma (University of Sydney) Chair: Max Grömping (University of Sydney)


The Electoral Integrity Project is an independent research team based at the University of Sydney and the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. It explores many issues, focusing upon three main questions:

- When do elections meet international standards of electoral integrity? - What happens when elections fail to do so? - And what can be done to mitigate these problems?

For more information see: www.electoralintegrityproject.com
Date
Source YouTube: Carolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015) – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author Electoral Integrity Project

Licensing[edit]

This video, screenshot or audio excerpt was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license.
Their website states: "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license."
To the uploader: You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available.
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Attribution: Electoral Integrity Project
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This file, which was originally posted to YouTube: Carolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015) – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today, was reviewed on 14 May 2017 by reviewer Daphne Lantier, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current18:08, 13 May 201721 min 44 s, 1,280 × 720 (120.9 MB)Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-9FdJVyKFE

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 720P 803 kbps Completed 09:08, 21 August 2018 31 min 49 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) 714 kbps Completed 16:52, 6 February 2024 8.0 s
VP9 480P 446 kbps Completed 08:58, 21 August 2018 22 min 29 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) 357 kbps Completed 14:46, 14 January 2024 4.0 s
VP9 360P 262 kbps Completed 08:50, 21 August 2018 14 min 18 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) 173 kbps Completed 17:11, 18 January 2024 3.0 s
VP9 240P 174 kbps Completed 08:47, 21 August 2018 12 min 16 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 85 kbps Completed 10:26, 5 December 2023 2.0 s
WebM 360P 580 kbps Completed 18:27, 13 May 2017 19 min 31 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1 Mbps Completed 21:34, 1 November 2023 45 s
Stereo (Opus) 86 kbps Completed 04:24, 17 November 2023 19 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 18:47, 31 October 2023 41 s

File usage on other wikis

The following other wikis use this file: