File:Bodycam Footage of Jesse Romero Shooting by LAPD Officer.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 1 min 52 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 2.63 Mbps overall, file size: 34.99 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: The parents of a 14-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a Los Angeles Police Department officer held a news conference Tuesday where they released body cam footage of the deadly encounter. Jesse Romero's parents joined attorneys and activists at the news conference, where partial body cam footage from Romero's fatal 2016 shooting by an LAPD officer was shown for the first time. The family's attorney Humberto Guizar says the graphic footage disproves the city's claim that Romero shot at officers first, and shows that he was unarmed when shot by police responding to a vandalism call. The body cam footage shown by Guizar showed the perspective of the "shooting" officer and the "following" officer while chasing Romero. An investigation by the Justice System Integrity Division of the Los Angeles County district attorney's office found that LAPD Officer Eden Medina used "reasonable force in self-defense and defense of others" during the Aug. 9, 2016, shooting. The Feb. 28, 2018, report states that Medina was forced to "make a split second decision" prior to shooting Romero. The LAPD released a statement Tuesday afternoon in response to the partial release of the body cam video. The statement reads in part: "The Los Angeles Police Department understands that any time that an officer uses deadly force that ends in a fatality it is a painful tragedy for the family and friends of the suspect, the community and the officers involved. This is why the LAPD, its oversight bodies, and the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office scrutinizes these incidents as closely as possible to ensure that the use of deadly force was appropriate to defend the life of the officer or members of the public." Guizar urged "scared" witnesses to come forward and tell the "truth" about what they saw that day.
Date
Source YouTube: Bodycam Footage of Jesse Romero Shooting by LAPD Officer – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author LAPD

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work was created by a government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies) that derives its powers from the laws of the State of California and is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.). It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so. This applies even if there is a copyright notice, so long as the State of California or one of its agencies (other than those listed above) is indicated as the copyright holder.

Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to these images unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Copyrightable Works by the State in the United States: Works published by agencies that are permitted to claim copyright per state law should be tagged with {{PD-US-GovEdict}} instead of this template due to the reasons listed on that template.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current15:57, 20 May 20231 min 52 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (34.99 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmmS6uVNDKU

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 5.09 Mbps Completed 16:19, 20 May 2023 21 min 41 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 4.99 Mbps Completed 02:07, 31 January 2024 5.0 s
VP9 720P 2.65 Mbps Completed 16:03, 20 May 2023 5 min 23 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) 2.55 Mbps Completed 23:03, 5 February 2024 4.0 s
VP9 480P 1.38 Mbps Completed 19:59, 20 May 2023 15 min 39 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) 1.28 Mbps Completed 08:56, 12 January 2024 2.0 s
VP9 360P 733 kbps Completed 19:57, 20 May 2023 15 min 20 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) 634 kbps Completed 04:04, 17 January 2024 2.0 s
VP9 240P 420 kbps Completed 19:48, 20 May 2023 6 min 31 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 321 kbps Completed 05:00, 16 December 2023 1.0 s
WebM 360P 662 kbps Completed 19:44, 20 May 2023 1 min 16 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1.01 Mbps Completed 05:07, 1 November 2023 10 s
Stereo (Opus) 99 kbps Completed 09:14, 16 November 2023 3.0 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 11:45, 30 October 2023 5.0 s

Metadata