File:Bodycam Footage of Cops Shooting Suspect at San Diego Police Headquarters.webm
Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 6 min 34 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.05 Mbps overall, file size: 49.33 MB)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionBodycam Footage of Cops Shooting Suspect at San Diego Police Headquarters.webm |
English: San Diego, California — The San Diego Police Department on Wednesday released video footage of an officer-involved shooting that took place Sunday in the sally port of SDPD headquarters located in the downtown area. SDPD officers shot and wounded 25-year-old Keith Bergman after they said he slipped handcuffs and grabbed an officer's backup gun firing at least one round. At about 6:20pm, a 911 call came in from a downtown hotel about a man causing a disturbance. He had been pepper sprayed and held down by hotel security for threatening to stab hotel staff. San diego police officers responded and took the 25-year old man into custody without incident. The man was evaluated for being under the influence and placed under arrest.
A search of his pockets revealed methamphetamine and five credit cards that did not belong to him. He was taken to police headquarters for processing. While sitting in the back of a patrol car in the sally port, he slipped one hand free from his handcuffs. He then broke through a plexiglass barrier, reached into the rear area of the car, and grabbed a backpack that contained an officer's back-up handgun. The security camera video shows the beginning of the incident when the man is alone in the car. An officer, hearing the commotion, opens the door to discover the man is free of his handcuffs. As other officers approach the car, they see that he is holding a handgun. They draw their service weapons and attempt to persuade him to drop the gun with no success. Officers back up in an effort to de-escalate and continue to give the order to surrender. The man fires a round out of the back of the patrol car. A security camera catches flying debris as the bullet penetrates the rear glass. That portion has been highlighted in the video. After several minutes, the man reaches through the broken glass and opens the rear door. He exits with the backpack and the handgun tucked in his waist. He tries and fails to open the rear hatch. The man then tries to open the driver door and an officer fires three rounds. The man tries again and a fourth round is fired. A k-9 was deployed and the man was taken into custody. Once the handgun was secured, officers immediately began first aid until paramedics arrived. The man was transported to the hospital with non-life threatening injures |
Date | |
Source | YouTube: Bodycam Footage of Cops Shooting Suspect at San Diego Police Headquarters – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today |
Author | San Diego Police Department. |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work was created by a government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies) that derives its powers from the laws of the State of California and is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.). It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records. Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored. Agencies permitted to claim copyright
California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:
County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so. This applies even if there is a copyright notice, so long as the State of California or one of its agencies (other than those listed above) is indicated as the copyright holder. Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to these images unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?. Copyrightable Works by the State in the United States: Works published by agencies that are permitted to claim copyright per state law should be tagged with {{PD-US-GovEdict}} instead of this template due to the reasons listed on that template. Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer). |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:59, 18 May 2023 | 6 min 34 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (49.33 MB) | Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs) | Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zGa9zRNC9w |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Transcode status
Update transcode statusMetadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Software used | Lavf58.76.100 |
---|