File:Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology (IA analyzingdepartm109451133).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.2 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 132 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Gilliland, John E.
Title
Analyzing Department of Defense's use of other transactions as a method for accessing non-traditional technology
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

As U.S. Defense budgets and military research and development spending experienced significant decline between 1988 and 1998, the Defense Technology and Industrial Base essentially merged with the national industrial base. DOD reform occurred more slowly than changes in the private sector fueled by advances in technology. U.S. national security relies upon the ability of the military to maintain technological superiority. To attract advanced technology companies that normally do not participate in defense business to the defense market, Congress provided a new contracting authority, Section 845 Other Transaction Authority (OTA). This study examines the effectiveness of its byproduct, Section 845 Other Transactions (OTs). Opinions and performance data regarding the effectiveness of Section 845 OTs were solicited from non-traditional companies that participated in OTs from 1994 to 2000. Significant disagreement was found within the Federal Government concerning the definition of a non-traditional company. It was also found that DOD does not quantify the amount of technology it accessed with OTs. Many of the non-traditional companies with which DOD participated in OT-based relationships came from markets where significant defense business already exists. In sum, DOD achieved uncertain and varied success in using OTs to achieve their stated.


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date December 2001
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
analyzingdepartm109451133
Source
Internet Archive identifier: analyzingdepartm109451133
https://archive.org/download/analyzingdepartm109451133/analyzingdepartm109451133.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current09:36, 14 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 09:36, 14 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 132 pages (2.2 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection analyzingdepartm109451133 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #6818)

Metadata