File:Analysis of Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, General Accounting Office, and Federal Court Decisions on best value in Federal procurement (IA analysisofarmeds1094510904).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.74 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 117 pages)
Captions
Captions
Summary[edit]
Analysis of Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, General Accounting Office, and Federal Court Decisions on best value in Federal procurement
(   ) |
|
|---|---|
| Author |
Hoffman, Scott J. |
| Title |
Analysis of Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, General Accounting Office, and Federal Court Decisions on best value in Federal procurement |
| Description |
This thesis analyzed four significant rulings by the Federal Courts, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, and General Accounting Office with respect to disputes regarding the best value selections in Government procurement and recommended ways to integrate these lessons into procurement organizations. Best value entails the use of weighted factors that reflect the relative importance of each factor to the user. This allows the introduction of past performance, experience, technical approach, and other factors to be considered in addition to price. The thesis analyzed the issues of four specific cases to determine if there is a pattern of weakness in a specific area of best value implementation. The aim is to bring any weaknesses to the attention of the acquisition professional in order to promote better application of best value and avoid future disputes, or at a minimum eliminate sustained disputes against the Government. This thesis also looked at the commercial sector use of best value selections to view the similarities and differences that can be used to compare strengths and weaknesses of the Government's approach. Subjects: |
| Language | English |
| Publication date | June 2001 |
| Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
| Accession number |
analysisofarmeds1094510904 |
| Source | |
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. |
Licensing[edit]
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
 |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | ||
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 06:06, 14 July 2020 |  | 1,275 × 1,650, 117 pages (4.74 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection analysisofarmeds1094510904 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #6284) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file: