File:An analysis of the remediation systems on the contaminant plume at the Plainville landfill (IA analysisofremedi00wood).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,143 × 1,579 pixels, file size: 3.93 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 106 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

An analysis of the remediation systems on the contaminant plume at the Plainville landfill   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Woodworth, Renee L.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
An analysis of the remediation systems on the contaminant plume at the Plainville landfill
Publisher
Springfield, Virginia: Available from National Technical Information Service
Description
"June 1999"
Thesis (Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering) Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 1999
Includes bibliographical references (37-41 leafs)
The Plainville landfill, located in Plainville, Massachusetts, has been the subject of study by several groups in recent years. A contaminant plume, exiting from the southwest corner of the landfill, is contaminating the groundwater downgradient and may affect drinking water wells located there. A two-phase remediation scheme, consisting of an interim overburden air sparging system and a final proposed pump and treat and air sparging system, has been proposed to mitigate the groundwater contaminant plume. This thesis assesses these remediation systems to determine their ability to remediate the contaminants in the groundwater plume. The interim and final proposed air sparging systems were analyzed using existing quarterly reports and a literature review. A MODFLOW groundwater flow model was used to analyze the pump and treat system. These analyses were then compared to the model utilized to design the remediation scheme. Several discrepancies in the design of the remediation scheme were noted as a result of this analysis. First, the presence of till lenses throughout the remediation zone was not addressed. Also, the extraction of water from the competent bedrock layer appears counterproductive. In addition, the air sparging system was not field tested to ascertain the flow pattern in the subsurface. Finally, the installation of the bedrock air sparging wells appears redundant. These discrepancies, however, will only decrease the projected efficiency of the proposed remediation schemes and increase clean up time. Consequently, the results of this study seem to indicate that the proposed remediation scheme is adequately designed
Mode of access: World Wide Web
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader 7.0
dk/dk cc:9116 7/6/99

Subjects:
Language en_US
Publication date 1 June 1999
publication_date QS:P577,+1999-06-01T00:00:00Z/11
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink; americana
Accession number
analysisofremedi00wood
Authority file  OCLC: 1039515778
Source
Internet Archive identifier: analysisofremedi00wood
https://archive.org/download/analysisofremedi00wood/analysisofremedi00wood.pdf

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current08:38, 14 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 08:38, 14 July 20201,143 × 1,579, 106 pages (3.93 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection analysisofremedi00wood (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #6660)

Metadata