File:Alternative dispute resolution- a viable method for settling government contract disputes (IA alternativedispu1094539785).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.78 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 120 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Alternative dispute resolution: a viable method for settling government contract disputes   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Eaton, David S.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Alternative dispute resolution: a viable method for settling government contract disputes
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

While arbitration and mediation have gained almost universal acceptance for settling commercial contract disputes, resolution of contract disputes in the Federal Government has continued to be slow, time consuming, and expensive. The participants in these processes have turned toward a new approach that offers an expedient, inexpensive, and less adversarial method for settling these disputes known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This thesis provides information on various methods of ADR, detailing advantages, disadvantages, and characteristics for case suitability. The research found, through the interviews conducted and the literature reviewed, that there are general misconceptions and impediments to the implementation of ADR. There was a general lack of knowledge of the different methods of ADR available. Many of the personnel interviewed did not know of their full authority to use ADR as provided by the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. One major obstacle that was found in evaluating ADR is that there is an absence of reliable data to support the claims of ADR. Personnel interviewed in the Federal Government indicated that there is a lack of incentives for the Government to use ADR. One reason for this was due to the use of the 'continued performance clause.


Subjects: Alternate dispute resolution; ADR; Arbitration; Mediation; Mini-trials; Contract disputes
Language English
Publication date June 1993
publication_date QS:P577,+1993-06-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
alternativedispu1094539785
Source
Internet Archive identifier: alternativedispu1094539785
https://archive.org/download/alternativedispu1094539785/alternativedispu1094539785.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current04:14, 14 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 04:14, 14 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 120 pages (4.78 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection alternativedispu1094539785 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #6001)

Metadata