File:A cost-based analysis on using DoD civilian workforce to perform ordnance support in Pearl Harbor (IA acostbasednalysi1094556827).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 1.02 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 60 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A cost-based analysis on using DoD civilian workforce to perform ordnance support in Pearl Harbor   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Tran, Thanh-Nhunancy T.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A cost-based analysis on using DoD civilian workforce to perform ordnance support in Pearl Harbor
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

This study conducts a cost-based analysis to determine the feasibility of insourcing the ordnance handling at Navy Munitions Command Pacific East Asia Division Detachment Pearl Harbor (NMCPAC EAD DET PH). Contractors have provided the service for over 30 years, after an Office of Management and Budget A-76 study in the 1980s determined it was more economical for the private sector to do the work previously done by military service members. This study examines whether using the government civilian workforce to perform ordnance handling generates cost savings when compared with contracting. Using a cost-based analysis, this study reviews all the associated costs of converting to a government civilian workforce and compares them with the cost of contracting out these services. Based on the methodology and data used in this study, the findings show savings from using government civilian workforce over contracting starting with year seven. The recommendation is for NMCPAC EAD DET PH to revert to insourcing the labor and purchasing/leasing the material for ordnance handling operations in order to provide the service in-house instead of continuing to contract out. This can generate monetary savings and other intangible benefits, such as better command and control.


Subjects: cost-based analysis; A-76 study; cost-benefit analysis; Navy Munitions Command; ordnance handling; insourcing; contracting
Language English
Publication date December 2017
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acostbasednalysi1094556827
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acostbasednalysi1094556827
https://archive.org/download/acostbasednalysi1094556827/acostbasednalysi1094556827.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current22:16, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 22:16, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 60 pages (1.02 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acostbasednalysi1094556827 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5299)

Metadata