File:A comparison of tactical leader decision making between automated and live counterparts in a virtual environment (IA acomparisonoftac1094542705).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.95 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 120 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparison of tactical leader decision making between automated and live counterparts in a virtual environment   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Patton, Scott A.
Title
A comparison of tactical leader decision making between automated and live counterparts in a virtual environment
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The use of responsible autonomous systems may not be far away. Prior to developing or using responsible autonomous systems, it may be important to know if tactical leaders would make different types of decisions with automated systems than they would make with a human live crew. This work attempts to determine if decisions, time to make decisions, and confidence in decisions differ when tactical leaders rely on an autonomous wingman or a live wingman. Virtual Battlespace Simulation 2 was used to provide the virtual environment in which 30 military personnel completed a simulated mission that entailed five decision points. Participants were randomly assigned to have an autonomous or live wingman. Decision patterns were compared to a standard based on Army Doctrine for mechanized infantry Bradley sections and subject matter experts. Results indicated no significant group difference in decisions made, time to make decisions, and confidence in decisions. However, significant group differences emerged in the aspects of the wingman that participants trusted most and least. Although most participants indicated that they would not trust autonomous wingmen in real combat, results suggest that participants would revert to doctrinal decisions when faced with an unambiguous situation with an unmanned system with which they had some experience.


Subjects: Decision Making; Unmanned Systems; Human Robotic Integration
Language English
Publication date June 2014
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparisonoftac1094542705
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparisonoftac1094542705
https://archive.org/download/acomparisonoftac1094542705/acomparisonoftac1094542705.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:48, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:48, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 120 pages (2.95 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonoftac1094542705 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5241)

Metadata