File:A comparison of neural network and regression models for Navy retention modeling (IA acomparisonofneu1094539890).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.25 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 126 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparison of neural network and regression models for Navy retention modeling   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Russell, Bradley Steven
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A comparison of neural network and regression models for Navy retention modeling
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

This thesis evaluates a possible use of artificial neural networks for military manpower and personnel analysis. Two neural network models were constructed to predict the reenlistment behavior of a select group of individuals in the Navy, from a sample of 680 individuals. The data were extracted from the 1985 DoD Survey of Officer and Enlisted Personnel. Explanatory variables were grouped into demographic/personal, military characteristics, perceived probability of civilian employment, educational level, and satisfaction with military life and military benefits. The first neural network model was compared to a more traditional method of statistical modeling (logistic regression analysis) to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the neural network model. Both models used the same set of 17 variables and were tested using a holdout sample of 100 observations. The neural network model was found to be comparable to the logistic regression model as a predictor, but deficient as a policy analysis model. The second neural network model was constructed using the same data set and architecture as the first neural network model, including the original 17 variables, plus an additional II variables that consisted of variables with and without theoretical foundation for predicting reenlistment. The two neural network models were then compared and found to be similar at predicting reenlistment. Both neural network models were considered to be deficient as tools for policy analysts...


Subjects: Artificial neural networks; Neural networks; Reenlistment behavior
Language English
Publication date March 1993
publication_date QS:P577,+1993-03-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparisonofneu1094539890
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparisonofneu1094539890
https://archive.org/download/acomparisonofneu1094539890/acomparisonofneu1094539890.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:45, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:45, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 126 pages (4.25 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonofneu1094539890 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5233)

Metadata