File:A comparison of in-situ measurements and satellite remote sensing of underwater visibility (IA acomparisonofins109451082).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 7.09 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 78 pages)
Captions
Summary[edit]
A comparison of in-situ measurements and satellite remote sensing of underwater visibility ( ) | ||
---|---|---|
Author |
Museler, Erica A. |
|
Title |
A comparison of in-situ measurements and satellite remote sensing of underwater visibility |
|
Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
|
Description |
SeaWiFS data converted to optical properties of the ocean in the form of vertical and horizontal underwater visibility products are compared to in-water diver and optical instrument measurements during the Model Diver Visibility (MoDiV) experiment. Results were collected from 19 to 21 August in the Mississippi Bight region of the United States. The SeaWiFS satellite data was processed with the Automated Processing System (APS), developed by the Naval Research Laboratory (Code 7333). APS converted radiance values into specific parameters studied: the beam attenuation coefficient, the diffuse attenuation coefficient, vertical visibility and horizontal visibility. These values were compared to the AC-9instrument, a-Beta instrument, Secchi disk and the observed visibilities from the divers. The results indicated that the beam attenuation coefficient and the diffuse attenuation coefficient are underestimated as compared to the in-situ measurements. These values then overestimate the vertical and horizontal visibility as compared to the Secchi disk and diver sightings. The visibility products from SeaWiFS should be used on an experimental basis for Naval Operational Planning. It is recommended that the use of in-water diver reports noting variability of SeaWiFS visibility product estimates are necessary for validation and offers feedback to the research and development field for algorithm improvement. Subjects: Underwater light; Measurement; Visibility |
|
Language | English | |
Publication date | March 2003 | |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
Accession number |
acomparisonofins109451082 |
|
Source | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:41, 13 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 78 pages (7.09 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonofins109451082 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5226) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | A comparison of in-situ measurements and satellite remote sensing of underwater visibility |
---|---|
Author | Museler, Erica A. |
Software used | Museler, Erica A. |
Conversion program | Acrobat Distiller 5.0 (Windows) |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |