File:A comparison of computational cognitive models - agent-based systems versus rule-based architectures (IA acomparisonofcom109451079).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 810 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 81 pages)
Captions
Captions
Summary[edit]
A comparison of computational cognitive models : agent-based systems versus rule-based architectures
(   ) |
||
|---|---|---|
| Author |
Oeltjen, Craig L. |
 |
| Title |
A comparison of computational cognitive models : agent-based systems versus rule-based architectures |
|
| Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
|
| Description |
Increased operational costs and reductions in force size are two of the major factors driving the need for improved computer simulations within the military community. Human performance models are used in various aspects of simulation, including controlling computer generated forces, tactical decision aides, intelligent tutoring systems and new system design. This research makes a comparison between two categories of human performance models, multi-agent systems and rule-based architectures. Each type of model has its own strengths and weaknesses, and is therefore better suited for certain applications. Complex military simulations need human performance models that take advantage of the strengths of more than one type of model. The purpose of this research is to compare the implementation and performance of these two models, and to demonstrate the need for hybrid systems that employ the best aspects of models for a given situation. Subjects: Performance technology; Computer simulation |
|
| Language | English | |
| Publication date | March 2003 | |
| Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
| Accession number |
acomparisonofcom109451079 |
|
| Source | ||
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. | |
Licensing[edit]
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
 |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | ||
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 21:35, 13 July 2020 |  | 1,275 × 1,650, 81 pages (810 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonofcom109451079 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5214) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file: