File:A comparison of an alternative inventory control concept with the Navy's existing wholesale inventory control procedures for repairables (IA acomparisonofnlt1094532757).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.67 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 104 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparison of an alternative inventory control concept with the Navy's existing wholesale inventory control procedures for repairables   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Kless, David R.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A comparison of an alternative inventory control concept with the Navy's existing wholesale inventory control procedures for repairables
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The Director of Planning and Operation Research Department, Naval Inventory Control Point (NAVICP) Code M041, requested a study to compare the performance of two sets of inventory control procedures for managing high-cost repairable items. One of these sets is embedded in the Navy's existing wholesale inventory control system. The procedures of this set characterize a periodic review process, which calculates four decision variables in order to manage Navy inventories. These variables represent how much to order, how much to repair, when to order, and when to repair. The other set of procedures are adapted from a commercial software package called Bandwidth Management developed by Stewart- Frazier Tools Inc. Two versions of these latter procedures are modeled in this thesis. These procedures characterize a periodic review process, which calculates three decision variables. These variables represent how much to deliver, how much to repair, and when to repair. This thesis uses simulation to model the two sets of procedures and to compare their performance with respect to three formal measures of effectiveness adopted by NAVICP: Supply Material Availability (SMA), Average Delay for a Delayed Requisition (ADDR), and Average Monthly Investment Level (AMIL). The comparison results of the thesis indicate that the existing Navy inventory procedures generate better performance in all three formal measures of effectiveness.


Subjects: NA
Language English
Publication date September 1998
publication_date QS:P577,+1998-09-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparisonofnlt1094532757
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparisonofnlt1094532757
https://archive.org/download/acomparisonofnlt1094532757/acomparisonofnlt1094532757.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:45, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:45, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 104 pages (4.67 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonofnlt1094532757 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5234)

Metadata