File:A comparison between the Navy standard workweek and the actual work and rest patterns of U.S. Navy Sailors (IA acomparisonbetwe109453298).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.77 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 128 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparison between the Navy standard workweek and the actual work and rest patterns of U.S. Navy Sailors   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Haynes, Leonard E.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A comparison between the Navy standard workweek and the actual work and rest patterns of U.S. Navy Sailors
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The demands placed upon the United States Navy are greater now than ever before. As ships become more versatile, Sailors must become proficient in many warfare areas while maintaining operational readiness. The primary manning tool used by the United States Navy to determine manpower requirements is the Navy Standard Workweek. This research seeks to determine if the Navy Standard Workweek accurately reflects the activities of deployed Sailors and determine their work and rest patterns. Each Sailor completed surveys detailing tasks in which they were engaged. Survey data were compared to the Navy Standard Workweek. Individual Sailors aboard USS CHUNG-HOON (DDG-93) wore Wrist Activity Monitors to collect actigraphy data. Actigraphy data were analyzed using the Fatigue Avoidance Scheduling Tool (FAST), which uses the Sleep, Activity, Fatigue and Task Effectiveness (SAFTE) Model, to predict the waking effectiveness level of each Sailor. The results showed that the Navy Standard Workweek does not accurately reflect the daily activities of Sailors. More importantly, based on FAST results, most Sailors had predicted effectiveness levels lower than the predicted effectiveness level of the Navy Standard Workweek Model. It is recommended that the Navy Standard Workweek be revised to more accurately reflect requirements of Sailors in different departments.


Subjects: Sailors; Circadian rhythms; Fatigue; Sleep; Actigraphy; Physiology
Language English
Publication date September 2007
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparisonbetwe109453298
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparisonbetwe109453298
https://archive.org/download/acomparisonbetwe109453298/acomparisonbetwe109453298.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:33, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:33, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 128 pages (2.77 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonbetwe109453298 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5209)

Metadata