File:A comparison between power line noise level field measurements and man-made radio noise prediction curves in the high frequency radio band (IA acomparisonbetwe109457457).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 23.95 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 115 pages)
Captions
Summary[edit]
A comparison between power line noise level field measurements and man-made radio noise prediction curves in the high frequency radio band ( ) | |
---|---|
Author |
Hodge, James W. |
Title |
A comparison between power line noise level field measurements and man-made radio noise prediction curves in the high frequency radio band |
Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
Description |
Radio frequency noise is often the limiting factor in the ability of a communications receiver to discern a desired signal from man made interference. The predominate man made radio noise source in the high frequency radio band is gap type breakdown discharges on electric power distribution lines. The International Radio Consultative Committee (CCIR) has published its Report 258 which predicts the level of man made radio noise in the business, residential, rural, and quiet rural environmental categories. This thesis compares field measurements of gap type breakdown discharge generated noise, made in the high and very high frequency radio bands, to CCIR Report 258 predictions. It is shown that CCIR noise-level predictions correspond to field measurements in the low end of the high frequency band. At higher frequencies the CCIR curve consistently predicts a lower noise level than was measured in the field. An explanation for the difference between field measurements and CCIR predictions is presented. A trend noticed in the noise amplitude versus receiver bandwidth data measurements is investigated and leads to the development of a receiver bandwidth adjustment matrix. Using this matrix the noise-power measurements made in one receiver bandwidth can be scaled to a different bandwidth. Subjects: |
Language | English |
Publication date |
December 1995 publication_date QS:P577,+1995-12-00T00:00:00Z/10 |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
Accession number |
acomparisonbetwe109457457 |
Source | |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:34, 13 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 115 pages (23.95 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparisonbetwe109457457 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5210) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | A comparison between power line noise level field measurements and man-made radio noise prediction curves in the high frequency radio band |
---|---|
Author | Hodge, James W. |
Date and time of digitizing | 06:10, 22 June 2012 |
Software used | EPSON GT-S80 |
File change date and time | 10:40, 25 June 2012 |
Date metadata was last modified | 10:40, 25 June 2012 |
Conversion program | Adobe Acrobat 9.51 Paper Capture Plug-in |
Encrypted | no |
Page size |
|
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |