File:A comparative analysis of the tactical routes selected by the CAMMS-Shaw decision aid with tactical routes selected by active duty officers (IA acomparativenaly1094534928).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.34 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 122 pages)
Captions
Captions
Summary[edit]
A comparative analysis of the tactical routes selected by the CAMMS/Shaw decision aid with tactical routes selected by active duty officers
(   ) |
||
|---|---|---|
| Author |
Regan, John S. |
 |
| Title |
A comparative analysis of the tactical routes selected by the CAMMS/Shaw decision aid with tactical routes selected by active duty officers |
|
| Publisher |
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School |
|
| Description |
This thesis is an evaluation of the performance of a tactical route decision aid model that was developed by CPT Charles Shaw in this 1989 Master's thesis. The decision aid was developed as a module inside the Condensed Army Mobility Management Model (CAMMS). The decision aid selects tactical route based upon a complex methodology which considers a number of variables in the tactical situation and the time available. The Janus(A) high resolution combat model was chosen to compare the routes selected by the decision aid against routes selected by active duty officers in two different areas of operation. A measure of effectiveness was selected based on the casualty figures generated by the Janus(A) model. When compared against the officer routes using the MOE, decision aid routes were more effective in one of the two areas of operation. Janus(A) was also used to determine if routes the decision aid deemed as better were more effective as measured by the MOE. The study found that some of the better routes were actually less effective in Janus(A). The study concludes that the model needs some refinement. Subjects: Operations research; Modeling.; CAMMS/SHAW; Tactical Optimum Path |
|
| Language | English | |
| Publication date | September 1990 | |
| Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
| Accession number |
acomparativenaly1094534928 |
|
| Source | ||
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. | |
Licensing[edit]
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
 |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | ||
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 06:46, 8 July 2020 |  | 1,275 × 1,650, 122 pages (4.34 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparativenaly1094534928 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1990-1992 #2797) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file: