File:A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency (IA acomparativenaly1094510964).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 6.01 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 143 pages)
Captions
Summary[edit]
A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency ( ) | |
---|---|
Author |
Dyson, Teddie L. |
Title |
A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency |
Description |
This thesis performs a comparative analysis of a sampling of risk management plans for strategic and critical suppliers administered by the Defense Contract Management District West (DCMDW) in order to identify the areas of highest risk and the most common tools used to mitigate risk in key processes and systems for these suppliers. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) uses a comprehensive, inclusive, and iterative approach to risk management. It follows the Government and DoD risk management premise of using a five-step approach to risk management and the basic idea of identifying and assessing key processes/systems whose risk, either through probability or potential impact, offers the most cause for concern from a performance, schedule, or cost perspective. It employs current information technology, Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) to provide consistency, commonality, access, and comparability to its risk management process. Performance and schedule, product support and supplier quality assurance for product quality, and delivery were the areas of highest risk for DCMA. The most commonly applied risk handling tools indicated in the RAMP database were areas associated with analysis, monitoring, and surveillance activities before final inspection: \"Data Analysis\", \"Product Audits\", \"System Evaluation\", and \"Corrective Action\" Subjects: |
Language | English |
Publication date | June 2001 |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
Accession number |
acomparativenaly1094510964 |
Source | |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:12, 13 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 143 pages (6.01 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparativenaly1094510964 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5167) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency |
---|---|
Author | Dyson, Teddie L. |
Software used | Dyson, Teddie L. |
Conversion program | Recoded by LuraDocument PDF v2.46 |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |