File:A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency (IA acomparativenaly1094510964).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 6.01 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 143 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Dyson, Teddie L.
Title
A comparative analysis of risk management plans within the Defense Contract Management Agency
Description

This thesis performs a comparative analysis of a sampling of risk management plans for strategic and critical suppliers administered by the Defense Contract Management District West (DCMDW) in order to identify the areas of highest risk and the most common tools used to mitigate risk in key processes and systems for these suppliers. The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) uses a comprehensive, inclusive, and iterative approach to risk management. It follows the Government and DoD risk management premise of using a five-step approach to risk management and the basic idea of identifying and assessing key processes/systems whose risk, either through probability or potential impact, offers the most cause for concern from a performance, schedule, or cost perspective. It employs current information technology, Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) to provide consistency, commonality, access, and comparability to its risk management process. Performance and schedule, product support and supplier quality assurance for product quality, and delivery were the areas of highest risk for DCMA. The most commonly applied risk handling tools indicated in the RAMP database were areas associated with analysis, monitoring, and surveillance activities before final inspection: \"Data Analysis\", \"Product Audits\", \"System Evaluation\", and \"Corrective Action\"


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date June 2001
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparativenaly1094510964
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparativenaly1094510964
https://archive.org/download/acomparativenaly1094510964/acomparativenaly1094510964.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:12, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:12, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 143 pages (6.01 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparativenaly1094510964 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5167)

Metadata