File:A comparative analysis of promotion probabilities for Marine Corps field grade officers with special attention given to graduates of the Naval Postgraduate School (IA acomparativenaly1094531549).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 2.01 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 53 pages)
Captions
Summary[edit]
A comparative analysis of promotion probabilities for Marine Corps field grade officers with special attention given to graduates of the Naval Postgraduate School ( ) | ||
---|---|---|
Author |
Estridge, David W. |
|
Title |
A comparative analysis of promotion probabilities for Marine Corps field grade officers with special attention given to graduates of the Naval Postgraduate School |
|
Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
|
Description |
This thesis analyzes the relationship between selection to the Marine Corps' Field grade ranks of major and lieutenant colonel and certain personal and professional characteristics. Special attention is given to officers who graduated from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California. A performance index, computed from each officer's Master Brief Sheet, is included in the models to control for differences in performance. Cross-tabulations and multivariate logistic and ordinary-least-squares regression models are used to analyze characteristics associated with selection probabilities. The results of the analysis indicate that being augmented into the regular Marine Corps, being in the pilot, combat and service support occupational specialties, and accession through the U.S. Naval Academy increase the likelihood of selection to major. For selection to lieutenant colonel, being caucasian, being in occupational specialties other than combat and being accessed through the U.S. Naval Academy or the NROTC increase selection probabilities. For both grades, above average performance, personal decorations and graduating from the Naval Postgraduate School increased the likelihood of selection. Subjects: |
|
Language | English | |
Publication date |
March 1995 publication_date QS:P577,+1995-03-00T00:00:00Z/10 |
|
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
Accession number |
acomparativenaly1094531549 |
|
Source | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:17, 13 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 53 pages (2.01 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparativenaly1094531549 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5177) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title |
|
---|---|
Author | Estridge, David W. |
Date and time of digitizing | 14:46, 12 February 2003 |
Software used | LuraDocument PDF Compressor Server 5.7.66.46 (original: tif_convert_2_ps()) |
File change date and time | 07:01, 13 March 2012 |
Date metadata was last modified | 07:01, 13 March 2012 |
Conversion program | Recoded by LuraDocument PDF v2.46 |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |