File:A comparative analysis of United States and Chinese economic engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa (IA acomparativenaly1094548522).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 433 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 48 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A comparative analysis of United States and Chinese economic engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Furman, James Housley, Jr.
Title
A comparative analysis of United States and Chinese economic engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

Much has been written about Chinese enterprise in sub-Saharan Africa, most bad and some good, which is mainly due to the profit-driven approach, where aid distribution is tied to trade, directly or indirectly. The United States’ relationship to the region is fundamentally different, following a Western model of conditional aid attached to structural and social reform. The U.S. trade relationships with sub-Saharan Africa are separate from its aid levers, representing only 1% of total foreign business, within the time frame of this study. The literature is divided as to which of the two countries’ economic engagement is best for sub-Saharan nations. Based on the analysis, which appears to be most instructive for the United States’ and sub-Saharan African countries’ mutual development goals, this research supports a trade model, in general, and appears to be most informative for the United States’ version that separates trade and aid. China implicitly links aid to trade, which is found to benefit sub-Saharan Africa more so than U.S. aid alone, but its results are not measurable by normal foreign aid standards. The goal of this paper is to inform the broad economic engagement approach, which best achieves U.S. stated goals in the region.


Subjects: Chinese trade and aid; sub-Saharan Africa trade and aid; United States African trade and aid
Language English
Publication date March 2016
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acomparativenaly1094548522
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acomparativenaly1094548522
https://archive.org/download/acomparativenaly1094548522/acomparativenaly1094548522.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:23, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 21:23, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 48 pages (433 KB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acomparativenaly1094548522 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5189)

Metadata