File:A case study of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAVP) program from a contracting perspective (IA acasestudyofadva1094532620).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.91 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 140 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A case study of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAVP) program from a contracting perspective   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Dalton, Ronald R.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A case study of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAVP) program from a contracting perspective
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

This research effort focused on the contracting history of the U.S. Marine Corps Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) Program. The research answered the primary question of what were the critical contracting decisions that have been made during the program and how would an analysis of these contracting decisions affect the future of the AAAV program. Interviews were conducted with personnel from the AAAV program office and other Government agencies as well as with contractor employees. Additionally, program documents and other relevant literature was reviewed. The key findings of the research effort conclude that the unique collocation arrangement of the AAAV program office and the contractor should be emulated by other Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs); Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and the Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) concept is effective in improving communications between the Government and the contractor; and Unique contract clauses used in the Concept Demonstration and Validation contract were effective in incentivizing the contractor. The unique contract clauses examined were: mandatory geographic location of the contractor's facility, collocation of the AAAV program office with the contractor, a Special Design Decision Provision, and contractor cost sharing. The research effort presents recommendations on how these aspects of the AAAV program can be applied to other MDAPs.


Subjects: NA
Language English
Publication date December 1998
publication_date QS:P577,+1998-12-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acasestudyofadva1094532620
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acasestudyofadva1094532620
https://archive.org/download/acasestudyofadva1094532620/acasestudyofadva1094532620.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:17, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 20:17, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 140 pages (4.91 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acasestudyofadva1094532620 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5070)

Metadata